|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online July 20, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3001-3017 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02305
Free-flight responses of Drosophila melanogaster to attractive odors
1 Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA
91125, USA
2 Division of Bioengineering Option, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: sbudick{at}caltech.edu)
Accepted 26 April 2006
Many motile organisms localize the source of attractive odorants by following plumes upwind. In the case of D. melanogaster, little is known of how individuals alter their flight trajectories after encountering and losing a plume of an attractive odorant. We have characterized the three-dimensional flight behavior of D. melanogaster in a wind tunnel under a variety of odor conditions. In the absence of olfactory cues, hungry flies initiate flight and display anemotactic orientation. Following contact with a narrow ribbon plume of an attractive odor, flies reduce their crosswind velocity while flying faster upwind, resulting in a surge directed toward the odor source. Following loss of odor contact due to plume truncation, flies frequently initiate a stereotyped crosswind casting response, a behavior rarely observed in a continuous odor plume. Similarly, within a homogeneous odor cloud, flies move fast while maintaining an upwind heading. These results indicate both similarities and differences between the behavior of D. melanogaster and the responses of male moths to pheromone plumes, suggesting possible differences in underlying neural mechanisms.
Key words: Drosophila, insect, free flight, odor, olfaction, search, chemotaxis, anemotaxis, flight control
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. K. Tanaka, K. Ito, and M. Stopfer Odor-Evoked Neural Oscillations in Drosophila Are Mediated by Widely Branching Interneurons J. Neurosci., July 1, 2009; 29(26): 8595 - 8603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Wesson, J. V. Verhagen, and M. Wachowiak Why Sniff Fast? The Relationship Between Sniff Frequency, Odor Discrimination, and Receptor Neuron Activation in the Rat J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 1089 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Chow and M. A. Frye Context-dependent olfactory enhancement of optomotor flight control in Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2478 - 2485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Swartz, K. S. Breuer, and D. J. Willis Aeromechanics in aeroecology: flight biology in the aerosphere Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 85 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Card and M. Dickinson Performance trade-offs in the flight initiation of Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): 341 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Budick, M. B. Reiser, and M. H. Dickinson The role of visual and mechanosensory cues in structuring forward flight in Drosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2007; 210(23): 4092 - 4103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||