QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online June 15, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2395-2408 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02310

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rubenson, J. Articles by Marsh, R. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rubenson, J. Articles by Marsh, R. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The cost of running uphill: linking organismal and muscle energy use in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris)

Jonas Rubenson, Havalee T. Henry, Peter M. Dimoulas and Richard L. Marsh^*

Department of Biology, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: r.marsh{at}neu.edu)

Accepted 3 May 2006

Uphill running requires more energy than level running at the same speed, largely due to the additional mechanical work of elevating the body weight. We explored the distribution of energy use among the leg muscles of guinea fowl running on the level and uphill using both organismal energy expenditure (oxygen consumption) and muscle blood flow measurements. We tested each bird under four conditions: (1) rest, (2) a moderate-speed level run at 1.5 m s^–1, (3) an incline run at 1.5 m s^–1 with a 15% gradient and (4) a fast level run at a speed eliciting the same metabolic rate as did running at a 15% gradient at 1.5 m s^–1 (2.28–2.39 m s^–1). The organismal energy expenditure increased by 30% between the moderate-speed level run and both the fast level run and the incline run, and was matched by a proportional increase in total blood flow to the leg muscles. We found that blood flow increased significantly to nearly all the leg muscles between the moderate-speed level run and the incline run. However, the increase in flow was distributed unevenly across the leg muscles, with just three muscles being responsible for over 50% of the total increase in blood flow during uphill running. Three muscles showed significant increases in blood flow with increased incline but not with an increase in speed. Increasing the volume of active muscle may explain why in a previous study a higher maximal rate of oxygen consumption was measured during uphill running. The majority of the increase in energy expenditure between level and incline running was used in stance-phase muscles. Proximal stance-phase extensor muscles with parallel fibers and short tendons, which have been considered particularly well suited for doing positive work on the center of mass, increased their mass-specific energy use during uphill running significantly more than pinnate stance-phase muscles. This finding provides some evidence for a division of labor among muscles used for mechanical work production based on their muscle–tendon architecture. Nevertheless, 33% of the total increase in energy use (40% of the increase in stance-phase energy use) during uphill running was provided by pinnate stance-phase muscles. Swing-phase muscles also increase their energy expenditure during uphill running, although to a lesser extent than that required by running faster on the level. These results suggest that neither muscle–tendon nor musculoskeletal architecture appear to greatly restrict the ability of muscles to do work during locomotor tasks such as uphill running, and that the added energy cost of running uphill is not solely due to lifting the body center of mass.

Key words: muscle, energetics, blood flow, running, uphill, guinea fowl, Numida meleagris

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Portugal, S. K. S. Thorpe, J. A. Green, J. P. Myatt, and P. J. Butler Testing the use/disuse hypothesis: pectoral and leg muscle changes in captive barnacle geese Branta leucopsis during wing moult J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2009; 212(15): 2403 - 2410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Rubenson and R. L. Marsh Mechanical efficiency of limb swing during walking and running in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2009; 106(5): 1618 - 1630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. S. Sawicki and D. P. Ferris Mechanics and energetics of incline walking with robotic ankle exoskeletons J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2009; 212(1): 32 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Higham and A. A. Biewener Integration within and between muscles during terrestrial locomotion: effects of incline and speed J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2008; 211(14): 2303 - 2316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Marsh and D. J. Ellerby Partitioning locomotor energy use among and within muscles Muscle blood flow as a measure of muscle oxygen consumption J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2006; 209(13): 2385 - 2394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]