QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online May 26, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2368-2376 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02183

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Price, T. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Price, T. D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Review Article: Phenotypic Plasticity in Evolution

Phenotypic plasticity, sexual selection and the evolution of colour patterns

Trevor D. Price

Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

e-mail: pricet{at}uchicago.edu

Accepted 21 February 2006

Summary

When a population comes to occupy a new environment, phenotypically plastic responses alter the distribution of phenotypes, and hence affect both the direction and the intensity of selection. Rates of evolution can be accelerated or retarded compared to what would happen in the absence of plasticity. Plastic responses in one trait result in novel selection pressures on other traits, and this can lead to evolution in completely different directions than predicted in the absence of plasticity. In this paper I use the concept of the adaptive surface in order to identify conditions under which the various different outcomes are expected. I then discuss differences between sexually and naturally selected traits. Sexually selected traits are often expected to be plastic in their expression, with individuals in high condition developing greater elaboration. As examples of sexually selected traits I review the evolution of colour patterns in birds with a view to assessing the magnitude of plastic responses in their development, and to ask how such responses may have influenced genetic evolution. The common colour pigments in birds are carotenoids and melanins. Both are used in social signaling, and consequently are expected to evolve to be phenotypically plastic indicators of an individual's quality. Perhaps partly because they are condition indicators, the quantity of carotenoids in the plumage can be strongly influenced by diet. Examples are described where alterations of carotenoids in the diet are thought to have altered the phenotype, driving genetic evolution in novel directions. Melanin patterns seem to be less affected by diet, but the intensity of melanization after moult is affected by social interactions during the moult and by raising birds in humid conditions. Hormonal manipulations can have dramatic effects on both the kinds of melanin produced (eumelanin or phaeomelanin) as well as the patterns they form. Differences between species in melanin patterns resemble differences produced by environmental manipulations, as well as those produced by simple modulations of parameters in computer simulations of pattern formation. While phenotypic plasticity is one way that genetic change in plumage patterns (and other traits) could be driven, there are others, including the appearance of major mutations and selection on standing variation whose distribution is not altered in the new environment. I consider some evidence for the different alternatives, and ask when they might lead to qualitatively different evolutionary outcomes.

Key words: carotenoid, colour pattern, melanin, plasticity, sexual selection

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY

Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2006 209: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. L. Rezende, K. A. Hammond, and M. A. Chappell Cold acclimation in Peromyscus: individual variation and sex effects in maximum and daily metabolism, organ mass and body composition J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2009; 212(17): 2795 - 2802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Robertson and K. R. Zamudio Genetic Diversification, Vicariance, and Selection in a Polytypic Frog J. Hered., July 9, 2009; (2009) esp041v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Delcourt, K. Rasanen, and A. P. Hendry Genetic and plastic components of divergent male intersexual behavior in Misty lake/stream stickleback Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1217 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Webster, C. W. Varian, and J. Karubian Plumage color and reproduction in the red-backed fairy-wren: Why be a dull breeder? Behav. Ecol., February 24, 2008; (2008) arn015v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Detto The fiddler crab Uca mjoebergi uses colour vision in mate choice Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2007; 274(1627): 2785 - 2790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Hemmi, J. Marshall, W. Pix, M. Vorobyev, and J. Zeil The variable colours of the fiddler crab Uca vomeris and their relation to background and predation J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2006; 209(20): 4140 - 4153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Garland Jr and S. A. Kelly Phenotypic plasticity and experimental evolution J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2006; 209(12): 2344 - 2361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Fordyce The evolutionary consequences of ecological interactions mediated through phenotypic plasticity J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2006; 209(12): 2377 - 2383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]