spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 26, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2344-2361 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02244
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garland, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garland, T., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, S. A.

Review Article: Phenotypic Plasticity in Evolution

Phenotypic plasticity and experimental evolution

Theodore Garland, Jr* and Scott A. Kelly

Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: tgarland{at}ucr.edu)

Accepted 29 March 2006

Summary

Natural or artificial selection that favors higher values of a particular trait within a given population should engender an evolutionary response that increases the mean value of the trait. For this prediction to hold, the phenotypic variance of the trait must be caused in part by additive effects of alleles segregating in the population, and also the trait must not be too strongly genetically correlated with other traits that are under selection. Another prediction, rarely discussed in the literature, is that directional selection should favor alleles that increase phenotypic plasticity in the direction of selection, where phenotypic plasticity is defined as the ability of one genotype to produce more than one phenotype when exposed to different environments. This prediction has received relatively little empirical attention. Nonetheless, many laboratory experiments impose selection regimes that could allow for the evolution of enhanced plasticity (e.g. desiccation trials with Drosophila that last for several hours or days). We review one example that involved culturing of Drosophila on lemon for multiple generations and then tested for enhanced plasticity of detoxifying enzymes. We also review an example with vertebrates that involves selective breeding for high voluntary activity levels in house mice, targeting wheel-running behavior on days 5+6 of a 6-day wheel exposure. This selection regime allows for the possibility of wheel running itself or subordinate traits that support such running to increase in plasticity over days 1–4 of wheel access. Indeed, some traits, such as the concentration of the glucose transporter GLUT4 in gastrocnemius muscle, do show enhanced plasticity in the selected lines over a 5–6 day period. In several experiments we have housed mice from both the Selected (S) and Control (C) lines with or without wheel access for several weeks to test for differences in plasticity (training effects). A variety of patterns were observed, including no training effects in either S or C mice, similar changes in both the S and C lines, greater changes in the S lines but in the same direction in the C lines, and even opposite directions of change in the S and C lines. For some of the traits that show a greater training effect in the S lines, but in the same direction as in C lines, the greater effect can be explained statistically by the greater wheel running exhibited by S lines (`more pain, more gain'). For others, however, the differences seem to reflect inherently greater plasticity in the S lines (i.e. for a given amount of stimulus, such as wheel running/day, individuals in the S lines show a greater response as compared with individuals in the C lines). We suggest that any selection experiment in which the selective event is more than instantaneous should explore whether plasticity in the appropriate (adaptive) direction has increased as a component of the response to selection.

Key words: adaptive plasticity, artificial selection, complex traits, environment, exercise, genotype, locomotion, mouse


Related articles in JEB:

PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY
Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2006 209: 0. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Nikinmaa and W. Waser
Molecular and cellular studies in evolutionary physiology of natural vertebrate populations: influences of individual variation and genetic components on sampling and measurements
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2007; 210(11): 1847 - 1857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
N. E. Rank, D. A. Bruce, D. M. McMillan, C. Barclay, and E. P. Dahlhoff
Phosphoglucose isomerase genotype affects running speed and heat shock protein expression after exposure to extreme temperatures in a montane willow beetle
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2007; 210(5): 750 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. T. Lightfoot
Experimentally evolving exercise endurance: one step at a time
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1277 - 1278.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. D. Price
Phenotypic plasticity, sexual selection and the evolution of colour patterns
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2006; 209(12): 2368 - 2376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Fordyce
The evolutionary consequences of ecological interactions mediated through phenotypic plasticity
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2006; 209(12): 2377 - 2383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006