spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 26, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2337-2343 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02209
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldring, C.
Right arrow Articles by Park, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldring, C.
Right arrow Articles by Park, B. K.

Review Article: Molecular Mechanisms of Phenotypic Plasticity

Plasticity in cell defence: access to and reactivity of critical protein residues and DNA response elements

Chris Goldring1,*, Neil Kitteringham1, Rosalind Jenkins1, Ian Copple1, Jean-Francois Jeannin2 and B. Kevin Park1

1 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, Merseyside, UK
2 Cancer Immunotherapy Laboratory, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, INSERM U517, Faculty of Medicine, Dijon, France

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: C.E.P.Goldring{at}liv.ac.uk)

Accepted 14 March 2006

Summary

Cellular and whole organ defence against pathogenic or chemical challenge is manifest as an adaptive response. Where appropriate, this may lead to induction of a cellular defence programme, thereby enhancing cell survival. When the challenge is overwhelming, the defence is breached and a switch is made to yield cell death, either by apoptosis or necrosis. Thus, a cell will defend itself where possible, but in extremis, it may recognise the futility of its resistance and allow itself to die. Transcription factor activation and access to the DNA regulatory elements that control a particular pattern of expression of defence genes is a major issue that may ultimately decide the fate of a cell in a changed environment. It is possible to visualise the access to the nucleus and to the genome, of paradigm gene loci or transcription factors, using a number of molecular techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation, in vivo footprinting and live/whole cell imaging. These methods are informative as to the array of transcription factors that may regulate a given gene, as well as the transitory nature of the transcriptional activation. The initial triggering of active transcription factor complexes typically occurs within the cytoplasm of the cell. Protein–protein interactions and signal transduction pathways, elucidated using a classical molecular genetics approach, have long been recognised as pivotal to the initial control of the levels and activity of transcription factors. We can now visualise modifications in critical residues of transcription factors and regulators during cellular response to chemical stress. These modifications may yield enhanced or repressed activity of transcription factors, they may be non-covalent or covalent, and they may occur in response to a variety of classes of chemicals. Such promiscuous signalling can provide plasticity in the cellular response to a wide array of chemical agents.

Key words: adaptation, proteins, stress, footprinting, transcription, iNOS, Nrf2, Keap1


Related articles in JEB:

PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY
Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2006 209: 0. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
S. Shin, N. Wakabayashi, V. Misra, S. Biswal, G. H. Lee, E. S. Agoston, M. Yamamoto, and T. W. Kensler
NRF2 Modulates Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Signaling: Influence on Adipogenesis
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2007; 27(20): 7188 - 7197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006