spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 26, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2293-2303 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01985
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nguyen, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nguyen, P. V.

Review Article: Phenotypic Plasticity of the Brain

Comparative plasticity of brain synapses in inbred mouse strains

P. V. Nguyen

Laboratory of Synaptic Plasticity, Department of Physiology and Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta School of Medicine, Medical Sciences Building, Edmonton, T6G 2H7, Canada

e-mail: Peter.Nguyen{at}ualberta.ca

Accepted 14 November 2005

Summary

One niche of experimental biology that has experienced considerable progress is the neurobiology of learning and memory. A key contributor to such progress has been the widespread use of transgenic and `knockout' mice to elucidate the mechanisms of identifiable phenotypes of learning and memory. Inbred mouse strains are needed to generate genetically modified mice. However, genetic variations between inbred strains can confound the interpretation of cellular neurophysiological phenotypes of mutant mice. It is known that altered physiological strength of synaptic transmission (`synaptic plasticity') can modify and regulate learning and memory. Characterization of the synaptic phenotypes of inbred mouse strains is needed to identify the most appropriate strains to use for generating mutant mouse models of memory function. More importantly, comparative electrophysiological analyses of inbred mice per se can also shed light on which forms of synaptic plasticity underlie particular types of learning and memory. Many such analyses have focused on synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus because of the critical roles of this brain structure in the formation and consolidation of long-term memories. Comparative electrophysiological data obtained from several inbred mouse strains are reviewed here to highlight the following key notions: (1) synaptic plasticity is influenced by the genetic backgrounds of inbred mice; (2) the plasticity of hippocampal synapses in inbred mice is `tuned' to particular temporal patterns of activity; (3) long-term potentiation, but not long-term depression, is a cellular correlate of behavioural memory performance in some strains; (4) synaptic phenotyping of inbred mouse strains can identify cellular models of memory impairment that can be used to elucidate mechanisms that may cause specific memory deficits.

Key words: synaptic plasticity, hippocampus, inbred mice, mouse strain, long-term potentiation (LTP), long-term depression (LTD), learning, memory


Related articles in JEB:

PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY
Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2006 209: 0. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
J.-Y. Sung, J.-S. Goo, D.-E. Lee, D.-Q. Jin, J. L. Bizon, M. Gallagher, and J.-S. Han
Learning strategy selection in the water maze and hippocampal CREB phosphorylation differ in two inbred strains of mice
Learn. Mem., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 183 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006