|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online May 26, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2293-2303 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01985
Review Article: Phenotypic Plasticity of the Brain |
Comparative plasticity of brain synapses in inbred mouse strains
Laboratory of Synaptic Plasticity, Department of Physiology and Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta School of Medicine, Medical Sciences Building, Edmonton, T6G 2H7, Canada
e-mail: Peter.Nguyen{at}ualberta.ca
Accepted 14 November 2005
Summary
One niche of experimental biology that has experienced considerable progress is the neurobiology of learning and memory. A key contributor to such progress has been the widespread use of transgenic and `knockout' mice to elucidate the mechanisms of identifiable phenotypes of learning and memory. Inbred mouse strains are needed to generate genetically modified mice. However, genetic variations between inbred strains can confound the interpretation of cellular neurophysiological phenotypes of mutant mice. It is known that altered physiological strength of synaptic transmission (`synaptic plasticity') can modify and regulate learning and memory. Characterization of the synaptic phenotypes of inbred mouse strains is needed to identify the most appropriate strains to use for generating mutant mouse models of memory function. More importantly, comparative electrophysiological analyses of inbred mice per se can also shed light on which forms of synaptic plasticity underlie particular types of learning and memory. Many such analyses have focused on synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus because of the critical roles of this brain structure in the formation and consolidation of long-term memories. Comparative electrophysiological data obtained from several inbred mouse strains are reviewed here to highlight the following key notions: (1) synaptic plasticity is influenced by the genetic backgrounds of inbred mice; (2) the plasticity of hippocampal synapses in inbred mice is `tuned' to particular temporal patterns of activity; (3) long-term potentiation, but not long-term depression, is a cellular correlate of behavioural memory performance in some strains; (4) synaptic phenotyping of inbred mouse strains can identify cellular models of memory impairment that can be used to elucidate mechanisms that may cause specific memory deficits.
Key words: synaptic plasticity, hippocampus, inbred mice, mouse strain, long-term potentiation (LTP), long-term depression (LTD), learning, memory
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Orr, K. Hittel, K. S. Lukowiak, J. Han, and K. Lukowiak Differences in LTM-forming capability between geographically different strains of Alberta Lymnaea stagnalis are maintained whether they are trained in the lab or in the wild J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2009; 212(23): 3911 - 3918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. R. Miller, A. G. Walker, A. S. Shah, S. J. Barton, and G. V. Rebec Dysregulated Information Processing by Medium Spiny Neurons in Striatum of Freely Behaving Mouse Models of Huntington's Disease J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 2205 - 2216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. G. Walker, B. R. Miller, J. N. Fritsch, S. J. Barton, and G. V. Rebec Altered Information Processing in the Prefrontal Cortex of Huntington's Disease Mouse Models J. Neurosci., September 3, 2008; 28(36): 8973 - 8982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-Y. Sung, J.-S. Goo, D.-E. Lee, D.-Q. Jin, J. L. Bizon, M. Gallagher, and J.-S. Han Learning strategy selection in the water maze and hippocampal CREB phosphorylation differ in two inbred strains of mice Learn. Mem., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 183 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
