|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online May 18, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2143-2155 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02255
The human gluteus maximus and its role in running
1 Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, 11 Divinity Avenue,
Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
2 Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112,
USA
3 Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona 1009 E. South Campus
Drive PO Box 210030, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: danlieb{at}fas.harvard.edu)
Accepted 5 April 2006
The human gluteus maximus is a distinctive muscle in terms of size, anatomy and function compared to apes and other non-human primates. Here we employ electromyographic and kinematic analyses of human subjects to test the hypothesis that the human gluteus maximus plays a more important role in running than walking. The results indicate that the gluteus maximus is mostly quiescent with low levels of activity during level and uphill walking, but increases substantially in activity and alters its timing with respect to speed during running. The major functions of the gluteus maximus during running are to control flexion of the trunk on the stance-side and to decelerate the swing leg; contractions of the stance-side gluteus maximus may also help to control flexion of the hip and to extend the thigh. Evidence for when the gluteus maximus became enlarged in human evolution is equivocal, but the muscle's minimal functional role during walking supports the hypothesis that enlargement of the gluteus maximus was likely important in the evolution of hominid running capabilities.
Key words: gluteus maximus, running, walking, locomotion, biomechanics, stabilization, human
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. G. Williams and J. P. Folland Similarity of polygenic profiles limits the potential for elite human physical performance J. Physiol., January 1, 2008; 586(1): 113 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||