spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 18, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2085-2102 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02266
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Markey, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall,, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Markey, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall,, C. R.

In vivo cranial suture function and suture morphology in the extant fish Polypterus: implications for inferring skull function in living and fossil fish

Molly J. Markey1,*, Russell P. Main2 and Charles R. Marshall,1,2

1 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, USA
2 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: markey{at}fas.harvard.edu)

Accepted 11 April 2006

This study describes the mechanical role that cranial sutures play in fish during feeding. The long-term goal of our work is to establish relationships between suture form and function, so that functional inferences can be made from suture morphology in fossil taxa. To this end, strain gauges were surgically implanted across selected sutures in the skull roof of four individuals of Polypterus endlicherii. After surgery, bone and suture strains during feeding were recorded along with high-speed video of the feeding events. Each trial was designated as a suction feeding or biting on prey trial, and neurocranial elevation, hyoid position and gape were quantified to aid in interpreting the strain data. The strains due to suction feeding are different from those observed during biting. Suction feeding results in a fairly stereotyped strain pattern, with the interfrontal and frontoparietal sutures experiencing tension, while the interparietal suture is compressed. Biting causes much more variable strain patterns. However, both suction and biting result in compression in the back of the skull, and tension between the frontals. Peak strains, and the time at which they occur in the feeding cycle, were compared between suction and biting. In general, peak suture strains are higher during suction than during biting, but not all of these differences are significant. Peak suture and bone strains occur at or near maximum gape during both suction and biting, suggesting that these strains are caused by muscle contraction involved in mouth opening and closing. Micro-computed tomography (microCT) scans of the experimental specimens indicate that the interfrontal and frontoparietal sutures, typically loaded in tension, are less interdigitated in cross section than the interparietal suture, which experiences compression. This is consistent with published correlations of suture form and function in mammals, where interdigitated sutures indicate compression and lack of interdigitation is associated with tension.

Key words: cranial, suture, skull, Polypterus endlicherii, bone strain, suction feeding




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. J. Markey and C. R. Marshall
Terrestrial-style feeding in a very early aquatic tetrapod is supported by evidence from experimental analysis of suture morphology
PNAS, April 24, 2007; 104(17): 7134 - 7138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006