spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online December 14, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 2-17 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01960
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muheim, R.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muheim, R.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, J. B.

Review Article

Calibration of magnetic and celestial compass cues in migratory birds - a review of cue-conflict experiments

Rachel Muheim1,2,*, Frank R. Moore3 and John B. Phillips2

1 Department of Animal Ecology, Lund University, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden
2 Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0406, USA
3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-5018, USA

* Author for correspondence at address 2 (e-mail: rmuheim{at}vt.edu)

Accepted 25 October 2005

Migratory birds use multiple sources of compass information for orientation, including the geomagnetic field, the sun, skylight polarization patterns and star patterns. In this paper we review the results of cue-conflict experiments designed to determine the relative importance of the different compass mechanisms, and how directional information from these compass mechanisms is integrated. We focus on cue-conflict experiments in which the magnetic field was shifted in alignment relative to natural celestial cues. Consistent with the conclusions of earlier authors, our analyses suggest that during the premigratory season, celestial information is given the greatest salience and used to recalibrate the magnetic compass by both juvenile and adult birds. Sunset polarized light patterns from the region of the sky near the horizon appear to provide the calibration reference for the magnetic compass. In contrast, during migration, a majority of experiments suggest that birds rely on the magnetic field as the primary source of compass information and use it to calibrate celestial compass cues, i.e. the relative saliency of magnetic and celestial cues is reversed. An alternative possibility, however, is suggested by several experiments in which birds exposed to a cue conflict during migration appear to have recalibrated the magnetic compass, i.e. their response is similar to that of birds exposed to cue conflicts during the premigratory season.

The general pattern to emerge from these analyses is that birds exposed to the cue conflict with a view of the entire sunset sky tended to recalibrate the magnetic compass, regardless of whether the cue conflict occurred during the premigratory or migratory period. In contrast, birds exposed to the cue conflict in orientation funnels and registration cages that restricted their view of the region of sky near the horizon (as was generally the case in experiments carried out during the migratory season) did not recalibrate the magnetic compass but, instead, used the magnetic compass to calibrate the other celestial compass systems. If access to critical celestial cues, rather than the timing of exposure to the cue conflict (i.e. premigratory vs migratory), determines whether recalibration of the magnetic compass occurs, this suggests that under natural conditions there may be a single calibration reference for all of the compass systems of migratory birds that is derived from sunset (and possibly also sunrise) polarized light cues from the region of sky near the horizon.

In cue-conflict experiments carried out during the migratory season, there was also an interesting asymmetry in the birds' response to magnetic fields shifted clockwise and counterclockwise relative to celestial cues. We discuss two possible explanations for these differences: (1) lateral asymmetry in the role of the right and left eye in mediating light-dependent magnetic compass orientation and (2) interference from the spectral and intensity distribution of skylight at sunset with the response of the light-dependent magnetic compass.

Key words: migratory orientation, compass calibration, cue conflict, magnetic compass, celestial compass




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Thorup, I.-A. Bisson, M. S. Bowlin, R. A. Holland, J. C. Wingfield, M. Ramenofsky, and M. Wikelski
Evidence for a navigational map stretching across the continental U.S. in a migratory songbird
PNAS, November 13, 2007; 104(46): 18115 - 18119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Wikelski, R. W. Kays, N. J. Kasdin, K. Thorup, J. A. Smith, and G. W. Swenson Jr
Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2007; 210(2): 181 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
T. Alerstam
Conflicting evidence about long-distance animal navigation.
Science, August 11, 2006; 313(5788): 791 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Muheim, J. B. Phillips, and S. Akesson
Polarized light cues underlie compass calibration in migratory songbirds.
Science, August 11, 2006; 313(5788): 837 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
J. H. Lange
Tradition Dies Hard
Indoor and Built Environment, August 1, 2006; 15(4): 301 - 303.
[PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006