QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online December 14, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 141-151 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01981

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wöhl, S. Articles by Schuster, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wöhl, S. Articles by Schuster, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Hunting archer fish match their take-off speed to distance from the future point of catch

Saskia Wöhl and Stefan Schuster^*

Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Institut für Zoologie II, Staudtstrasse 5, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: sschuste{at}biologie.uni-erlangen.de)

Accepted 9 November 2005

Archer fish can shoot down insect prey with a sharp jet of water. Fish usually fire from positions that are not directly below their target so that a dislodged insect falls ballistically with a horizontal velocity component. Only 100 ms after the insect is on its path both the shooter and other school members can initiate a rapid turn and then head straight in the direction of the later point of impact of their falling prey. The quick turn and subsequent take-off are performed `open-loop', based on the initial values of the falling insect's motion. We report here that archer fish can not only take off in the direction of the later point of impact but also predict its distance. Distance information allows the fish to adjust their take-off speed so that they would arrive within a narrow time slot slightly (about 50 ms) after their prey's impact, despite large differences in the size of the aligning turn and in the distance to be covered. Selecting a constant speed program with matched speed and catching the insect on the move minimizes frictional losses. The initial speed of starting fish is slightly but systematically too slow and is increased later so that the fish arrive 20 ms earlier than expected and often make the catch on a higher than take-off speed. The variability of later speed changes suggests a systematic `error' in the take-off, as if the fish underestimated distance. However, this apparent deficiency seems well adapted to the fish catching their prey at a high speed: if later the fish had no possibility to correct an initial error then it is better to start slightly too slow in order to minimize the risk of overshooting the point of catch.

Key words: prediction, motor planning, open-loop start, animal cognition, archer fish

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Schlegel and S. Schuster Small Circuits for Large Tasks: High-Speed Decision-Making in Archerfish Science, January 4, 2008; 319(5859): 104 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Higham The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: Morphology, behavior, and performance Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 82 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Wohl and S. Schuster The predictive start of hunting archer fish: a flexible and precise motor pattern performed with the kinematics of an escape C-start J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2007; 210(2): 311 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]