|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online April 26, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 1627-1634 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01503
Review article: Activity-induced variation of metabolism |
Multi-level regulation and metabolic scaling
1 Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of
California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9610, USA
2 Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC,
Canada V6T 1Z4
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: suarez{at}lifesci.ucsb.edu)
Accepted 18 January 2005
Summary
Metabolic control analysis has revealed that flux through pathways is the
consequence of system properties, i.e. shared control by multiple steps, as
well as the kinetic effects of various pathways and processes over each other.
This implies that the allometric scaling of flux rates must be understood in
terms of properties that pertain to the regulation of flux rates. In contrast,
proponents of models considering the scaling of branching or fractal-like
systems suggest that supply rates determine metabolic rates. Therefore, the
allometric scaling of supply alone provides a sufficient explanation for the
allometric scaling of metabolism. Examination of empirical data from the
literature of comparative physiology reveals that basal metabolic rates (BMR)
are driven by rates of energy expenditure within internal organs and that the
allometric scaling of BMR can be understood in terms of the scaling of the
masses and metabolic rates of internal organs. Organ metabolic rates represent
the sum of tissue metabolic rates while, within tissues, cellular metabolic
rates are the outcome of shared regulation by multiple processes. Maximal
metabolic rates (MMR, measured as maximum rates of O2 consumption,
O2max) during
exercise also scale allometrically, are also subject to control by multiple
processes, but are due mainly to O2 consumption by locomotory
muscles. Thus, analyses of the scaling of MMR must consider the scaling of
both muscle mass and muscle energy expenditure. Consistent with the principle
of symmorphosis, allometry in capacities for supply (the outcome of physical
design constraints) is observed to be roughly matched by allometry in
capacities for demand (i.e. for energy expenditure). However, physiological
rates most often fall far below maximum capacities and are subject to
multi-step regulation. Thus, mechanistic explanations for the scaling of BMR
and MMR must consider the manner in which capacities are matched and how rates
are regulated at multiple levels of biological organization.
Key words: metabolic regulation, respiration, mitochondria, BMR,
O2max, allometry
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Niven and S. B. Laughlin Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2008; 211(11): 1792 - 1804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Nagy, E. M. Victor, and J. H. Cropper Why don't all whales have cancer? A novel hypothesis resolving Peto's paradox Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 47(2): 317 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Brown, T. P. Gratton, and Jeffrey. A. Stuart Metabolic rate does not scale with body mass in cultured mammalian cells Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): R2115 - R2121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Chaui-Berlinck A critical understanding of the fractal model of metabolic scaling J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2006; 209(16): 3045 - 3054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ruggiero and L. Ferrucci The endeavor of high maintenance homeostasis: resting metabolic rate and the legacy of longevity. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., May 1, 2006; 61(5): 466 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Rezende, T. Garland Jr, M. A. Chappell, J. L. Malisch, and F. R. Gomes Maximum aerobic performance in lines of Mus selected for high wheel-running activity: effects of selection, oxygen availability and the mini-muscle phenotype J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2006; 209(1): 115 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||