QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online April 26, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 1621-1625 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01553

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nagy, K. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nagy, K. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Review article: Activity-induced variation of metabolism

Field metabolic rate and body size

Kenneth A. Nagy

University of California, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 621 Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA

e-mail: kennagy{at}biology.ucla.edu

Accepted 22 February 2005

Summary

The field metabolic rates (FMRs) of 229 species of terrestrial vertebrates, all measured using the doubly labeled water method in free-living individuals, were evaluated. Daily rates of energy expenditure were as low as 0.23 kJ per day in a small reptile (gecko), to as high as 52 500 kJ per day in a marine mammal (seal). This is a range of nearly six orders of magnitude. More than 70% of the variation in log-transformed data is due to variation in body size (expressed as body mass). Much of the remaining variation is accounted for by thermal physiology, with the endothermic mammals and birds having FMRs that are about 12 and 20 times higher, respectively, than FMRs of equivalent-sized, but ectothermic, reptiles. Variation in log(body mass) within each of these three taxonomic classes accounts for over 94% of the variation in log(FMR), and results from nonlinear regression analyses using untransformed data support this conclusion. However, the range of residual variation in mass-adjusted FMR within classes is still more than sixfold (ratio of highest over lowest). Some of this variation is associated with affiliations with lower taxonomic levels (Infraclass: eutherian vs metatherian mammals; Family: passerine, procellariform and galliform birds vs other birds), some is associated with habitat (especially desert vs nondesert), and some with differences in basic diet preference and foraging mode and season. The scaling slopes for FMR often differ from BMR slopes for the same Class of animals, and most differ from the theoretical slope of 0.75. Differences among slopes and intercepts that were detected using conventional regression analyses were largely confirmed upon reanalysis using Independent Contrasts Analysis to adjust for phylogenetic biases.

Key words: allometry, bird, doubly labeled water, ectothermy, endothermy, energetics, eutherian, FMR, mammal, metatherian, phylogeny, reptile, scaling coefficient

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

SIZE MATTERS

Yfke van Bergen and Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2005 208: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Chaves-Campos, Y.-m. Araya-Ajoy, C. A. Lizana-Moreno, and K. N. Rabenold The effect of local dominance and reciprocal tolerance on feeding aggregations of ocellated antbirds Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2009; 276(1675): 3995 - 4001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. K. McNab From the Cover: Resources and energetics determined dinosaur maximal size PNAS, July 21, 2009; 106(29): 12184 - 12188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Green, L. G. Halsey, R. P. Wilson, and P. B. Frappell Estimating energy expenditure of animals using the accelerometry technique: activity, inactivity and comparison with the heart-rate technique J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2009; 212(4): 471 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Niven and S. B. Laughlin Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2008; 211(11): 1792 - 1804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Heymsfield, D. Childers, J. Beetsch, D. B. Allison, and A. Pietrobelli Body size and human energy requirements: reduced mass-specific resting energy expenditure in tall adults J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2007; 103(5): 1543 - 1550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Hulbert, R. Pamplona, R. Buffenstein, and W. A. Buttemer Life and Death: Metabolic Rate, Membrane Composition, and Life Span of Animals Physiol Rev, October 1, 2007; 87(4): 1175 - 1213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. O'Connor, A. E. Sieg, and A. E. Dunham Linking physiological effects on activity and resource use to population level phenomena Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 46(6): 1093 - 1109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Speakman Body size, energy metabolism and lifespan J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2005; 208(9): 1717 - 1730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]