spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Propose a Workshop for 2011 spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 31, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 1435-1443 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01509
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nauwelaerts, S.
Right arrow Articles by Aerts, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nauwelaerts, S.
Right arrow Articles by Aerts, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Propulsive force calculations in swimming frogs I. A momentum–impulse approach

Sandra Nauwelaerts1,*, Eize J. Stamhuis2 and Peter Aerts1

1 Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, campus drie eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Wilrijk (Antwerpen), Belgium
2 Department of Marine Biology, University of Groningen, Biologisch centrum, Haren, The Netherlands

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: sandra.nauwelaerts{at}ua.ac.be)

Accepted 12 January 2005

Frogs are animals that are capable of locomotion in two physically different media, aquatic and terrestrial. A comparison of the kinematics of swimming frogs in a previous study revealed a difference in propulsive impulse between jumping and swimming. To explore this difference further, we determined the instantaneous forces during propulsion in swimming using an impulse–momentum approach based on DPIV flow data. The force profile obtained was compared with force profiles obtained from drag–thrust equilibrium of the centre of mass and with the force profiles generated during jumping. The new approach to quantifying the instantaneous forces during swimming was tested and proved to be a valid method for determining the external forces on the feet of swimming frogs.

On the kinematic profiles of swimming, leg extension precedes propulsion. This means that it is not only the acceleration of water backwards that provides thrust, but also that the deceleration of water flowing towards the frog as a result of recovery accelerates the centre of mass prior to leg extension.

The force profile obtained from the impulse–momentum approach exposed an overestimation of drag by 30% in the drag–thrust calculations. This means that the difference in impulse between jumping and swimming in frogs is even larger than previously stated. The difference between the force profiles, apart from a slightly higher peak force during jumping, lies mainly in a difference in shape. During swimming, maximal force is reached early in the extension phase, 20% into it, while during jumping, peak force is attained at 80% of the extension phase. This difference is caused by a difference in inter-limb coordination.

Key words: locomotion, swimming, frog, Rana esculenta, Anura, hind limb, DPIV, force


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. L. Lim and M. E. DeMont
Kinematics, hydrodynamics and force production of pleopods suggest jet-assisted walking in the American lobster (Homarus americanus)
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2009; 212(17): 2731 - 2745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J R Soc InterfaceHome page
S. Van Wassenbergh and P. Aerts
Rapid pivot feeding in pipefish: flow effects on prey and evaluation of simple dynamic modelling via computational fluid dynamics
J R Soc Interface, November 6, 2008; 5(28): 1291 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. T. Richards
The kinematic determinants of anuran swimming performance: an inverse and forward dynamics approach
J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2008; 211(19): 3181 - 3194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Peng and J. O. Dabiri
The `upstream wake' of swimming and flying animals and its correlation with propulsive efficiency
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2008; 211(16): 2669 - 2677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Peng and J. O. Dabiri
An overview of a Lagrangian method for analysis of animal wake dynamics
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 280 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. T. Richards and A. A. Biewener
Modulation of in vivo muscle power output during swimming in the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis)
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3147 - 3159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Peng, J. O. Dabiri, P. G. Madden, and G. V. Lauder
Non-invasive measurement of instantaneous forces during aquatic locomotion: a case study of the bluegill sunfish pectoral fin
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2007; 210(4): 685 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. J. Stamhuis and S. Nauwelaerts
Propulsive force calculations in swimming frogs II. Application of a vortex ring model to DPIV data
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2005; 208(8): 1445 - 1451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005