QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online March 31, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 1435-1443 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01509

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nauwelaerts, S. Articles by Aerts, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nauwelaerts, S. Articles by Aerts, P.

Propulsive force calculations in swimming frogs I. A momentum–impulse approach

Sandra Nauwelaerts^1,*, Eize J. Stamhuis² and Peter Aerts¹

¹ Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, campus drie eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Wilrijk (Antwerpen), Belgium
² Department of Marine Biology, University of Groningen, Biologisch centrum, Haren, The Netherlands

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: sandra.nauwelaerts{at}ua.ac.be)

Accepted 12 January 2005

Frogs are animals that are capable of locomotion in two physically different media, aquatic and terrestrial. A comparison of the kinematics of swimming frogs in a previous study revealed a difference in propulsive impulse between jumping and swimming. To explore this difference further, we determined the instantaneous forces during propulsion in swimming using an impulse–momentum approach based on DPIV flow data. The force profile obtained was compared with force profiles obtained from drag–thrust equilibrium of the centre of mass and with the force profiles generated during jumping. The new approach to quantifying the instantaneous forces during swimming was tested and proved to be a valid method for determining the external forces on the feet of swimming frogs.

On the kinematic profiles of swimming, leg extension precedes propulsion. This means that it is not only the acceleration of water backwards that provides thrust, but also that the deceleration of water flowing towards the frog as a result of recovery accelerates the centre of mass prior to leg extension.

The force profile obtained from the impulse–momentum approach exposed an overestimation of drag by 30% in the drag–thrust calculations. This means that the difference in impulse between jumping and swimming in frogs is even larger than previously stated. The difference between the force profiles, apart from a slightly higher peak force during jumping, lies mainly in a difference in shape. During swimming, maximal force is reached early in the extension phase, 20% into it, while during jumping, peak force is attained at 80% of the extension phase. This difference is caused by a difference in inter-limb coordination.

Key words: locomotion, swimming, frog, Rana esculenta, Anura, hind limb, DPIV, force

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Peng and J. O. Dabiri An overview of a Lagrangian method for analysis of animal wake dynamics J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 280 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. T. Richards and A. A. Biewener Modulation of in vivo muscle power output during swimming in the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis) J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3147 - 3159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Peng, J. O. Dabiri, P. G. Madden, and G. V. Lauder Non-invasive measurement of instantaneous forces during aquatic locomotion: a case study of the bluegill sunfish pectoral fin J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2007; 210(4): 685 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J. Stamhuis and S. Nauwelaerts Propulsive force calculations in swimming frogs II. Application of a vortex ring model to DPIV data J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2005; 208(8): 1445 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]