QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online March 8, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 939-949 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01472

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moritz, C. T. Articles by Farley, C. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moritz, C. T. Articles by Farley, C. T. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Human hopping on very soft elastic surfaces: implications for muscle pre-stretch and elastic energy storage in locomotion

Chet T. Moritz^1,2,* and Claire T. Farley¹

¹ Locomotion Laboratory, Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0354 USA
² Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140 USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ctmoritz{at}u.washington.edu)

Accepted 21 December 2004

During hopping in place and running, humans maintain similar center of mass dynamics by precisely adjusting leg mechanics to compensate for moderate changes in surface stiffness. We investigated the limits of this precise control by asking humans to hop in place on extremely soft elastic surfaces. We found that hoppers drastically altered leg mechanics and maintained similar center of mass dynamics despite a sevenfold change in surface stiffness (11–81 kN m^-1). On the stiffest surfaces, the legs compressed in early stance and then extended in late stance in the pattern that is typical for normal bouncing gaits. On the softest surfaces, however, subjects reversed this pattern so that the legs extended up to 8 cm in early stance and then compressed by a similar distance in late stance. Consequently, the center of mass moved downward during stance by 5–7 cm less than the surface compressed and by a similar distance as on the stiffest surfaces. This unique leg action probably reduced extensor muscle pre-stretch because the joints first extended and then flexed during stance. This interpretation is supported by the observation that hoppers increased muscle activation by 50% on the softest surface despite similar joint moments and mechanical leg work as on the stiffest surface. Thus, the extreme adjustment to leg mechanics for very soft surfaces helps maintain normal center of mass dynamics but requires high muscle activation levels due to the loss of the normal extensor muscle stretch–shorten cycle.

Key words: running, biomechanics, spring-mass model, gait

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Grabowski and H. M. Herr Leg exoskeleton reduces the metabolic cost of human hopping J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2009; 107(3): 670 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Nishikawa, A. A. Biewener, P. Aerts, A. N. Ahn, H. J. Chiel, M. A. Daley, T. L. Daniel, R. J. Full, M. E. Hale, T. L. Hedrick, et al. Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 16 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Daley and A. A. Biewener Running over rough terrain reveals limb control for intrinsic stability PNAS, October 17, 2006; 103(42): 15681 - 15686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Ferris, Z. A. Bohra, J. R. Lukos, and C. R. Kinnaird Neuromechanical adaptation to hopping with an elastic ankle-foot orthosis J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2006; 100(1): 163 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]