spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online January 25, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 571-584 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01429
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Król, E.
Right arrow Articles by Speakman, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Król, E.
Right arrow Articles by Speakman, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effect of photoperiod on body mass, food intake and body composition in the field vole, Microtus agrestis

E. Król1,*, P. Redman1, P. J. Thomson1, R. Williams1, C. Mayer2, J. G. Mercer3 and J. R. Speakman1,3

1 Aberdeen Centre for Energy Regulation and Obesity (ACERO), School of Biological Sciences, Zoology Building, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, UK
2 BioSS Office, Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK
3 ACERO, Division of Energy Balance and Obesity, Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: e.krol{at}abdn.ac.uk)

Accepted 6 December 2004

Many small mammals respond to seasonal changes in photoperiod by altering body mass and adiposity. These animals may provide valuable models for understanding the regulation of energy balance. Here, we present data on the field vole (Microtus agrestis) – a previously uncharacterised example of photoperiod-induced changes in body mass. We examined the effect of increased day length on body mass, food intake, apparent digestive efficiency, body composition, de novo lipogenesis and fatty acid composition of adipose tissue in cold-acclimated (8°C) male field voles by transferring them from a short (SD, 8 h:16 h L:D) to long day photoperiod (LD, 16 h:8 h L:D). During the first 4 weeks of exposure to LD, voles underwent a substantial increase in body mass, after which the average difference between body masses of LD and SD voles stabilized at 7.5 g. This 24.8% increase in body mass reflected significant increases in absolute amounts of all body components, including dry fat mass, dry lean mass and body water mass. After correcting body composition and organ morphology data for the differences in body mass, only gonads (testes and seminal vesicles) were enlarged due to photoperiod treatment. To meet energetic demands of deposition and maintenance of extra tissue, voles adjusted their food intake to an increasing body mass and improved their apparent digestive efficiency. Consequently, although mass-corrected food intake did not differ between the photoperiod groups, the LD voles undergoing body mass increase assimilated on average 8.4 kJ day-1 more than animals maintained in SD. The majority (73–77%) of the fat accumulated as adipose tissue had dietary origin. The rate of de novo lipogenesis and fatty acid composition of adipose tissue were not affected by photoperiod. The most important characteristics of the photoperiodic regulation of energy balance in the field vole are the clear delineation between phases where animals regulate body mass at two different levels and the rate at which animals are able to switch between different levels of energy homeostasis. Our data indicate that the field vole may provide an attractive novel animal model for investigation of the regulation of body mass and energy homeostasis at both organism and molecular levels.

Key words: photoperiod, energy balance, digestive efficiency, organ morphology, de novo lipogenesis, fatty acid composition, Siberian hamster, Syrian hamster, collared lemming, field vole, Microtus agrestis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Lab AnimHome page
J. Speakman, C. Hambly, S. Mitchell, and E. Krol
The contribution of animal models to the study of obesity
Lab Anim, October 1, 2008; 42(4): 413 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
T. Sousa, T. Domingos, and S.A.L.M Kooijman
From empirical patterns to theory: a formal metabolic theory of life
Phil Trans R Soc B, July 27, 2008; 363(1502): 2453 - 2464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Q. Lu, W.-Q. Zhong, and D.-H. Wang
Effects of photoperiod history on body mass and energy metabolism in Brandt's voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii)
J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 210(21): 3838 - 3847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
E. Krol and J. R Speakman
Regulation of body mass and adiposity in the field vole, Microtus agrestis: a model of leptin resistance
J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2007; 192(2): 271 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005