QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online January 25, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 539-548 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01416

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Winter, Y. Articles by Stich, K. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Winter, Y. Articles by Stich, K. P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Foraging in a complex naturalistic environment: capacity of spatial working memory in flower bats

York Winter^1,2,* and Kai Petra Stich²

¹ Department of Biology, University of Munich, 82152 München-Martinsried, Germany
² Max-Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: winter{at}zi.biologie.uni-muenchen.de)

Accepted 30 November 2004

Memory systems have evolved under selection pressures, such as the need to remember the locations of resources or past events within spatiotemporally dynamic natural environments. The full repertoire of complex behaviours exhibited by animals in dynamic surroundings are, however, difficult to elicit within simply structured laboratory environments. We have developed a computer-controlled naturalistic environment with 64 feeders for simulating dynamic patterns of water or food resource availability (depletion and replenishment) within the laboratory. The combination of feeder and cage remote control permits the automated transfer of animals between cage and test arena and, therefore, high experimental throughput and minimal disturbance to the animals (bats and mice). In the present study, we investigated spatial working memory in nectar-feeding bats (Glossophaga soricina, Phyllostomidae) collecting food from a 64-feeder array. Feeders gave only single rewards within trials so that efficient foraging required bats to avoid depleted locations. Initially, bats tended to revisit feeders (win-stay), but within three trials changed towards a win-shift strategy. The significant avoidance of revisits could not be explained by algorithmic search guiding movement through the array nor by scent cues left by the bats themselves and, thus, the data suggest that bats remembered spatial locations depleted of food. An examination of the recency effect on spatial working memory after bats shifted to a win-shift strategy indicated that bats held more than 40 behaviour actions (feeder visits) in working memory without indication of decay. This result surpasses previous findings for other taxa.

Key words: spatial memory, orientation, cognition, foraging, bats

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. H. Fleming, C. Geiselman, and W. J. Kress The evolution of bat pollination: a phylogenetic perspective Ann. Bot., November 1, 2009; 104(6): 1017 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Ulanovsky and C. F. Moss What the bat's voice tells the bat's brain PNAS, June 24, 2008; 105(25): 8491 - 8498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. P. Stich and Y. Winter Lack of generalization of object discrimination between spatial contexts by a bat J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 209(23): 4802 - 4808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Jensen, C. F. Moss, and A. Surlykke Echolocating bats can use acoustic landmarks for spatial orientation J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2005; 208(23): 4399 - 4410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]