QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online January 25, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 461-468 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01369

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dangles, O. Articles by Casas, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dangles, O. Articles by Casas, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Variation in morphology and performance of predator-sensing system in wild cricket populations

Olivier Dangles^*, Christelle Magal, Dominique Pierre, Aurélie Olivier and Jérôme Casas

Université de Tours, IRBI UMR CNRS 6035, Parc Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: olivier.dangles{at}univ-tours.fr)

Accepted 1 November 2004

Even though variation in morphology is known to translate into variation in performance, studies looking at structural variability of a sensor to predict its consequences on the performance of animals are exceedingly rare. We investigated the morphological variability of air-flow-sensing receptors in wild populations of wood crickets (Nemobius sylvestris) sampled in a wide variety of habitats differing in latitude, litter structure, vegetation and predator communities. These hair receptors act as predator sensors. The observed levels of hair morphological variation were then incorporated into a biomechanical model of the hair canopy response to air flow to predict their influence on cricket predator perception. Cricket populations differ from each other, often strongly so, in the total number of hairs and in the number of hairs longer than 1 mm, which are the hairs most sensitive for the perception of approaching predators. The hair canopy response, the output of the biomechanical model, sums up over the entire canopy the angles of deflection at which a neurophysiological response is triggered and represents the sensitivity of the cercal system. It is 35% higher in the most sensitive population, compared with the least sensitive population. These large differences in perception sensitivity for a given predator signal translate into larger distances at which predators could be perceived. Thus, differences in morphology at the sensor level seem to be translated both at the perception level and subsequently at the performance level of crickets.

Key words: air current detection, biomechanical model, mechanoreceptors, predator-prey interactions, sensory ecology

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

HAIRY CRICKETS DETECT SNEAKY PREDATORS

Yfke van Bergen
JEB 2005 208: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Dangles, D. Pierre, C. Magal, F. Vannier, and J. Casas Ontogeny of air-motion sensing in cricket J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2006; 209(21): 4363 - 4370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Dangles, J. Casas, and I. Coolen Textbook cricket goes to the field: the ecological scene of the neuroethological play J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2006; 209(3): 393 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. van Bergen HAIRY CRICKETS DETECT SNEAKY PREDATORS J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2005; 208(3): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF]