|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online January 25, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 447-459 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01407
Dynamic flight stability of a hovering bumblebee
Institute of Fluid Mechanics, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: m.sun{at}263.net)
Accepted 24 November 2004
The longitudinal dynamic flight stability of a hovering bumblebee was studied using the method of computational fluid dynamics to compute the aerodynamic derivatives and the techniques of eigenvalue and eigenvector analysis for solving the equations of motion.
For the longitudinal disturbed motion, three natural modes were identified: one unstable oscillatory mode, one stable fast subsidence mode and one stable slow subsidence mode. The unstable oscillatory mode consists of pitching and horizontal moving oscillations with negligible vertical motion. The period of the oscillations is 0.32 s (approx. 50 times the wingbeat period of the bumblebee). The oscillations double in amplitude in 0.1 s; coupling of nose-up pitching with forward horizontal motion (and nose-down pitching with backward horizontal motion) in this mode causes the instability. The stable fast subsidence mode consists of monotonic pitching and horizontal motions, which decay to half of the starting values in 0.024 s. The stable slow subsidence mode is mainly a monotonic descending (or ascending) motion, which decays to half of its starting value in 0.37 s.
Due to the unstable oscillatory mode, the hovering flight of the bumblebee is dynamically unstable. However, the instability might not be a great problem to a bumblebee that tries to stay hovering: the time for the initial disturbances to double (0.1 s) is more than 15 times the wingbeat period (6.4 ms), and the bumblebee has plenty of time to adjust its wing motion before the disturbances grow large.
Key words: dynamic stability, flapping flight, hovering, bumblebee, insect, Navier-Stokes simulation, natural modes of motion, bumblebee
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. H. Wu, Y. L. Zhang, and M. Sun Hovering of model insects: simulation by coupling equations of motion with Navier-Stokes equations J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2009; 212(20): 3313 - 3329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. A. Combes and R. Dudley From the Cover: Turbulence-driven instabilities limit insect flight performance PNAS, June 2, 2009; 106(22): 9105 - 9108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. K. Taylor, M. Bacic, R. J. Bomphrey, A. C. Carruthers, J. Gillies, S. M. Walker, and A. L. R. Thomas New experimental approaches to the biology of flight control systems J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 258 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and J. K. Wang Flight stabilization control of a hovering model insect J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 210(15): 2714 - 2722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Tanaka and K. Kawachi Response characteristics of visual altitude control system in Bombus terrestris J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2006; 209(22): 4533 - 4545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. K Taylor and R. Zbikowski Nonlinear time-periodic models of the longitudinal flight dynamics of desert locusts Schistocerca gregaria J R Soc Interface, June 22, 2005; 2(3): 197 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
