spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 4, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 4213-4222 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01896
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hofmann, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkens, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hofmann, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkens, L. A.

Response properties of electrosensory afferent fibers and secondary brain stem neurons in the paddlefish

Michael H. Hofmann1,*, Boris Chagnaud1 and Lon A. Wilkens2

1 University of Bonn, Institute of Zoology, Poppelsdorfer Schloss, 53115 Bonn, Germany
2 Center for Neurodynamics, Department of Biology, University of Missouri-St Louis, MO 63121, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: mhofmann{at}uni-bonn.de)

Accepted 22 September 2005

The passive electrosense is used by many aquatic animals to detect weak electric fields from other animals or from geoelectric sources. In contrast to the active electrosense, `passive' means that there are no electric organs, and only external fields are measured. Electroreceptors are distributed in the skin, but are different from other skin senses because they can detect and localize sources a considerable distance away. Distant sources, however, stimulate a large number of receptors at the same time and central circuits have to compute the exact location of the source from this distributed information. In order to gain insights into the algorithms involved, we compared the response properties of units in the dorsal octavolateral nucleus (DON) with primary afferent fibers in the paddlefish. The following parameters were tested: spontaneous activity, sensitivity, frequency tuning, receptive field size, movement sensitivity, and topography within the DON. Although there are some differences in spontaneous activity and receptive field size, there are no major differences between primary afferents and DON units that could reveal any substantial amount of spatial information processing. In particular the lack of any topographic order whithin the DON renders a lateral interaction between neighboring receptive fields unlikely.

Key words: passive electroreception, paddlefish, Polyodon spathula, dorsal octavolateral nucleus, topography


Related articles in JEB:

ELECTROSENSE TELLS PADDLEFISH THE TIME
Yfke van Bergen
JEB 2005 208: ii. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. H. Hofmann, S. N. Jung, U. Siebenaller, M. Preissner, B. P. Chagnaud, and L. A. Wilkens
Response properties of electrosensory units in the midbrain tectum of the paddlefish (Polyodon spathula Walbaum)
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2008; 211(5): 773 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Y. van Bergen
ELECTROSENSE TELLS PADDLEFISH THE TIME
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2005; 208(22): ii - ii.
[Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005