QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online October 21, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 4123-4135 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01880

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vladusich, T. Articles by Zeil, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vladusich, T. Articles by Zeil, J.

Interactions of visual odometry and landmark guidance during food search in honeybees

Tony Vladusich^1,*, Jan M. Hemmi², Mandyam V. Srinivasan² and Jochen Zeil²

¹ Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology and NeuroImaging Centre, School of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
² Centre for Visual Science, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: t.vladusich{at}med.umcg.nl)

Accepted 12 September 2005

How do honeybees use visual odometry and goal-defining landmarks to guide food search? In one experiment, bees were trained to forage in an optic-flow-rich tunnel with a landmark positioned directly above the feeder. Subsequent food-search tests indicated that bees searched much more accurately when both odometric and landmark cues were available than when only odometry was available. When the two cue sources were set in conflict, by shifting the position of the landmark in the tunnel during test, bees overwhelmingly used landmark cues rather than odometry. In another experiment, odometric cues were removed by training and testing in axially striped tunnels. The data show that bees did not weight landmarks as highly as when odometric cues were available, tending to search in the vicinity of the landmark for shorter periods. A third experiment, in which bees were trained with odometry but without a landmark, showed that a novel landmark placed anywhere in the tunnel during testing prevented bees from searching beyond the landmark location. Two further experiments, involving training bees to relatively longer distances with a goal-defining landmark, produced similar results to the initial experiment. One caveat was that, with the removal of the familiar landmark, bees tended to overshoot the training location, relative to the case where bees were trained without a landmark. Taken together, the results suggest that bees assign appropriate significance to odometric and landmark cues in a more flexible and dynamic way than previously envisaged.

Key words: navigation, honeybee, odometry, landmark, Apis mellifera

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. G. Dyer, M. G. P. Rosa, and D. H. Reser Honeybees can recognise images of complex natural scenes for use as potential landmarks J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1180 - 1186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Theobald, M. M. Coates, W. T. Wcislo, and E. J. Warrant Flight performance in night-flying sweat bees suffers at low light levels J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2007; 210(22): 4034 - 4042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Vladusich, J. M. Hemmi, and J. Zeil Honeybee odometry and scent guidance J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2006; 209(8): 1367 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]