QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online September 16, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 3721-3730 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01807

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bloodworth, B. Articles by Marshall, C. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bloodworth, B. Articles by Marshall, C. D.

Feeding kinematics of Kogia and Tursiops (Odontoceti: Cetacea): characterization of suction and ram feeding

Brian Bloodworth and Christopher D. Marshall^*

Texas A&M University at Galveston, 5007 Avenue U, Galveston, TX 77551, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: marshalc{at}tamug.edu)

Accepted 18 July 2005

The feeding kinematics of dwarf and pygmy sperm whales (Kogia sima and K. breviceps) and bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus were characterized and compared incorporating the Ram-Suction Index (RSI). Mean RSI data support a suction feeding strategy for Kogia (-0.67±0.29; mean ± S.D.) and a ram feeding strategy for Tursiops (0.94±0.11; mean ± S.D.). Tursiops displayed two ram-based feeding behaviours: open gape approach, where gape was at least 50% of maximum in the first video field, and closed gape approach, where gape increased near food items. Four feeding phases were identified in both odontocetes: preparatory, jaw opening, gular depression and jaw closing. The mean Kogia feeding cycle duration (470±139 ms) was significantly shorter (P<0.003) than all Tursiops groups (pooled: 863±337 ms; open gape approach: 1211±207 ms; closed gape approach: 662±207 ms). Kogia mean maximum gape angle (39.8±18.9°), mean maximum opening and closing gape angle velocities (293±261 deg. s^-1 and 223±121 deg. s^-1, respectively) were significantly greater (P<0.005) than pooled Tursiops mean maximum gape angle (24.8±6.6°), mean maximum opening and closing gape angle velocities (84±56 deg. s^-1 and 120±54 deg. s^-1, respectively). Negative Kogia RSI values were correlated with increasing maximum gular depression and retraction, wide gape angle, and rapid opening gape angle velocity. Kinematic data support functional hypotheses that odontocetes generate suction by rapid depression of the hyoid and tongue.

Key words: odontocete feeding, kinematics, RSI, suction, ram, Kogia, Tursiops

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. N. Cooper, N. Sedano, S. Johansson, B. May, J. D. Brown, C. M. Holliday, B. W. Kot, and F. E. Fish Hydrodynamic performance of the minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) flipper J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2008; 211(12): 1859 - 1867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Marshall, K. M. Kovacs, and C. Lydersen Feeding kinematics, suction and hydraulic jetting capabilities in bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus) J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2008; 211(5): 699 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Clark and A. P. Summers Morphology and kinematics of feeding in hagfish: possible functional advantages of jaws J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2007; 210(22): 3897 - 3909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Higham The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: Morphology, behavior, and performance Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 82 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]