QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online September 9, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 3533-3542 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01809

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Amoser, S. Articles by Ladich, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Amoser, S. Articles by Ladich, F.

Are hearing sensitivities of freshwater fish adapted to the ambient noise in their habitats?

Sonja Amoser^* and Friedrich Ladich

University of Vienna, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: sonja.amoser{at}univie.ac.at)

Accepted 26 July 2005

Several groups of fishes, among them two thirds of all freshwater fishes, have developed hearing specializations that enhance auditory sensitivity and broaden frequency ranges compared with hearing non-specialists (generalists), which lack such adaptations. It has been speculated that the enhanced sensitivities of these so-called hearing specialists have evolved in quiet habitats such as lakes, backwaters of rivers, slowly flowing streams or the deep sea. To test this hypothesis, noise levels and frequency spectra of four different freshwater habitats near Vienna, Austria (Danube River, Triesting stream, Lake Neusiedl, backwaters of the Danube River), were recorded and played back to native fish species while simultaneously measuring their auditory thresholds using the auditory evoked potential (AEP) recording technique. As a representative of hearing specialists, we chose the common carp (Cyprinus carpio, Cyprinidae) and for the hearing generalists the European perch (Perca fluviatilis, Percidae). Data show that the carp's hearing is only moderately masked by the quiet habitat noise level of standing waters (mean threshold shift 9 dB) but is heavily affected by stream and river noise by up to 49 dB in its best hearing range (0.5-1.0 kHz). In contrast, the perch's hearing thresholds were only slightly affected (mean up to 12 dB, at 0.1 kHz) by the highest noise levels presented. Our results indicate that hearing abilities of specialists such as carp are well adapted to the lowest noise levels encountered in freshwater habitats and that their hearing is considerably masked in some parts of their distribution range. Hearing in non-specialists such as perch, on the other hand, is only slightly or not at all impaired in all habitats.

Key words: fish, hearing specializations, evolution, masking, ambient noise, auditory evoked potential, freshwater, Cyprinus carpio, Perca fluviatilis

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. O. Vasconcelos and F. Ladich Development of vocalization, auditory sensitivity and acoustic communication in the Lusitanian toadfish Halobatrachus didactylus J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2008; 211(4): 502 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. O. Vasconcelos, M. C. P. Amorim, and F. Ladich Effects of ship noise on the detectability of communication signals in the Lusitanian toadfish J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2007; 210(12): 2104 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]