spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online September 9, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 3483-3491 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01810
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cobb, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cobb, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Olfactory coding in Drosophila larvae investigated by cross-adaptation

Jennefer Boyle and Matthew Cobb*

Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: cobb{at}manchester.ac.uk)

Accepted 26 July 2005

In order to reveal aspects of olfactory coding, the effects of sensory adaptation on the olfactory responses of first-instar Drosophila melanogaster larvae were tested. Larvae were pre-stimulated with a homologous series of acetic esters (C3-C9), and their responses to each of these odours were then measured. The overall patterns suggested that methyl acetate has no specific pathway but was detected by all the sensory pathways studied here, that butyl and pentyl acetate tended to have similar effects to each other and that hexyl acetate was processed separately from the other odours. In a number of cases, cross-adaptation transformed a control attractive response into a repulsive response; in no case was an increase in attractiveness observed. This was investigated by studying changes in dose-response curves following pre-stimulation. These findings are discussed in light of the possible intra- and intercellular mechanisms of adaptation and the advantage of altered sensitivity for the larva.

Key words: olfaction, Drosophila melanogaster, adaptation, maggot


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

WHAT'S THAT SMELL?
Yfke van Bergen
JEB 2005 208: i. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
A. Yarali, S. Ehser, F. Z. Hapil, J. Huang, and B. Gerber
Odour intensity learning in fruit flies
Proc R Soc B, October 7, 2009; 276(1672): 3413 - 3420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Keller and L. B. Vosshall
Influence of odorant receptor repertoire on odor perception in humans and fruit flies
PNAS, March 27, 2007; 104(13): 5614 - 5619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Chem SensesHome page
B. Gerber and R. F. Stocker
The Drosophila Larva as a Model for Studying Chemosensation and Chemosensory Learning: A Review
Chem Senses, January 1, 2007; 32(1): 65 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Y. van Bergen
WHAT'S THAT SMELL?
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): i - i.
[Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005