QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online September 9, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 3475-3482 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01814

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kemp, T. J. Articles by Carrier, D. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kemp, T. J. Articles by Carrier, D. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Functional trade-offs in the limb bones of dogs selected for running versus fighting

T. J. Kemp¹, K. N. Bachus², J. A. Nairn³ and D. R. Carrier^1,*

¹ Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
² Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
³ Department of Material Science Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: carrier{at}biology.utah.edu)

Accepted 25 July 2005

The physical demands of rapid and economical running differ from the demands of fighting in ways that may prevent the simultaneous evolution of optimal performance in these two behaviors. Here, we test an hypothesis of functional trade-off in limb bones by measuring mechanical properties of limb bones in two breeds of domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris L.) that have undergone intense artificial selection for running (greyhound) and fighting (pit bull) performance. The bones were loaded to fracture in three-point static bending. To correct for the effect of shear, we estimated the shear stress in the cross section and added energy due to shear stress to the tensile energy. The proximal limb bones of the pit bulls differed from those of the greyhounds in having relatively larger second moments of area of mid-diaphyseal cross sections and in having more circular cross-sectional shape. The pit bulls exhibited lower stresses at yield, had lower elastic moduli and failed at much higher levels of work. The stiffness of the tissue of the humerus, radius, femur and tibia was 1.5-2.4-fold greater in the greyhounds than in the pit bulls. These bones from the pit bulls absorbed 1.9-2.6-fold more energy before failure than did those of the greyhounds. These differences between breeds were not observed in the long bones of the feet, metacarpals and metatarsals. Nevertheless, the results of this analysis suggest that selection for high-speed running is associated with the evolution of relatively stiff, brittle limb bones, whereas selection for fighting performance leads to the evolution of limb bones with relatively high resistance to failure.

Key words: locomotion, aggression, bone mechanical properties, Canis lupus familiaris, greyhound, pit bull

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

PIT BULL IS TOP DOG IN A FIGHT

Yfke van Bergen
JEB 2005 208: iii. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. G. Drake and C. P. Klingenberg The pace of morphological change: historical transformation of skull shape in St Bernard dogs Proc R Soc B, January 7, 2008; 275(1630): 71 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Chappell, T. Garland Jr, G. F. Robertson, and W. Saltzman Relationships among running performance, aerobic physiology and organ mass in male Mongolian gerbils J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2007; 210(23): 4179 - 4197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. van Bergen PIT BULL IS TOP DOG IN A FIGHT J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): iii - iii. [Full Text] [PDF]