QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online August 18, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 3233-3247 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01790

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lehrer, M. Articles by Campan, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lehrer, M. Articles by Campan, R.

Generalization of convex shapes by bees: what are shapes made of?

Miriam Lehrer^1,* and Raymond Campan²

¹ Department of Neurobiology, Institute of Zoology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
² Laboratoire d'Ethologie et Cognition Animale, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse, France

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: miriam{at}zool.unizh.ch)

Accepted 11 July 2005

For about 70 years, bees were assumed not to possess the capacity to discriminate among convex shapes, such as a disc, a square or a triangle, based on results of early studies conducted by presenting shapes on horizontal planes. Using shapes presented on a vertical plane, we recently demonstrated that bees do discriminate among a variety of convex shapes. Several findings, summarized here, provide indirect evidence that discrimination is based on a cue located at the shapes' boundaries. In the present study, we test this hypothesis directly in two different ways. (1) Three groups of bees are each trained with a different pair of convex shapes, one positive (rewarding), the other not (negative), producing colour contrast, luminance contrast or motion contrast against the background. The trained bees are then offered a choice between pairs of stimuli whose shapes are identical to those of the training shapes, but whose contrast against the background is varied by changing the pattern, the colour or the luminance of the areas. The results show that bees discriminate between the pairs of novel shapes, i.e. they generalize the shapes among the different types of contrast, revealing that they use a particular cue extracted from the positive shape. The bees' choices between a stimulus that produces the correct contrast but has the wrong shape and one that possesses the correct shape but the wrong contrast show, in addition, that the relevant cue is not located within the area of the shape. (2) Bees trained with pairs of convex shapes are tested with the same pairs of shapes, but which lack the inner area, i.e. only the contours or fragments of the contours are presented in the tests. Bees are found to prefer the stimulus whose contours (or fragments of contours) agree with those of the positive training shape. Taken together, the results suggest that convex shapes are not represented by the form of their areas but rather by some cue located at their boundaries.

Key words: honeybee, shape discrimination, convex shape, colour contrast, luminance contrast, motion contrast, generalization

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. von der Emde and S. Fetz Distance, shape and more: recognition of object features during active electrolocation in a weakly electric fish J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 210(17): 3082 - 3095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]