QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online July 25, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 2845-2853 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01710

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lichtwark, G. A. Articles by Wilson, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lichtwark, G. A. Articles by Wilson, A. M.

Effects of series elasticity and activation conditions on muscle power output and efficiency

G. A. Lichtwark¹ and A. M. Wilson^1,2,*

¹ Structure and Motion Laboratory, Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University College London, Royal National Orthopedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK
² Structure and Motion Laboratory, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, UK

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: awilson{at}rvc.ac.uk)

Accepted 24 May 2005

The activation of a muscle depends on the function that it is performing and on the architectural properties of that muscle; the two are inextricably linked. Activation conditions such as activation timing, duration and amplitude can be varied throughout a cyclical movement (such as locomotion) and the length change of the whole muscle tendon unit (MTU) can also be varied. Architecturally, muscles have a range of fibre lengths, maximum force-producing capabilities and stiffness of the series elastic element (SEE). In the present work we use a model to explore the relationship between power output and efficiency of a muscle across a range of contraction conditions. We have also examined the mechanical and energetic effects of changing muscle architecture within the model. Our results indicate that whilst there are clear optimal conditions for achieving maximum power output and maximum efficiency, the design of the muscle allows high levels of both to be achieved over a range of activation conditions. This range changes with both SEE compliance and the amplitude of the cyclical length change. The results suggest that a compliant SEE allows a muscle to function closer to the maximum of both power output and efficiency. In addition, by varying the amplitude of the activation level, the efficiency can theoretically remain unchanged, whilst the power output can be modulated.

Key words: muscle, model, energetics, elasticity, biomechanics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. P. Magnusson, M. V. Narici, C. N. Maganaris, and M. Kjaer Human tendon behaviour and adaptation, in vivo J. Physiol., January 1, 2008; 586(1): 71 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Lichtwark and A. M. Wilson Interactions between the human gastrocnemius muscle and the Achilles tendon during incline, level and decline locomotion J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2006; 209(21): 4379 - 4388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Lichtwark and A. M. Wilson In vivo mechanical properties of the human Achilles tendon during one-legged hopping J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2005; 208(24): 4715 - 4725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]