spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 6, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 2707-2718 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01690
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DiBattista, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gilmour, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DiBattista, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gilmour, K. M.

The effects of cortisol administration on social status and brain monoaminergic activity in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss

Joseph D. DiBattista1,*, Hymie Anisman2, Megan Whitehead1 and Kathleen M. Gilmour1,{dagger}

1 Ottawa-Carleton Institute of Biology, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5 Canada
2 Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6 Canada

{dagger} Author for correspondence (e-mail: Katie.Gilmour{at}science.uottawa.ca)

Accepted 17 May 2005

The hypothesis that circulating cortisol levels influence the outcome of social interactions in rainbow trout was tested. Juvenile rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss were given a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) implant containing either cortisol (110 mg kg–1 fish), or cortisol plus the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist RU486 (mifepristone; 1100 mg kg–1 fish), and sampled after 5 days of social interactions with either a similar sized (<1.5% difference in fork length) or smaller conspecific (>5% difference). Within size-matched pairs of fish, cortisol treatment significantly increased the probability that the treated fish within each pair became subordinate, an effect that was abolished by simultaneous administration of RU486. Cortisol treatment also reduced the usual success of the larger fish within a pair to preferentially become dominant from 86% to 40% of pairs. To investigate one potential mechanism underlying the apparent effect of cortisol in predisposing trout to low social status, fish were treated with cortisol or cortisol+RU486 for 5 days, after which brain monoamines [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT); dopamine (DA)] and their major metabolites [5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (5-HIAA); 3,4-dihydroxy-phenylacetic acid (DOPAC)] were measured. Significant increases of serotonergic activity ([5-HIAA]/[5-HT] ratio) were detected in the telencephalon with cortisol treatment, an effect that was eliminated by simultaneous administration of RU486. Also, cortisol treatment significantly decreased dopaminergic activity in the telencephalon. Somewhat surprisingly, the effects of cortisol treatment on monoaminergic activity in the hypothalamus were opposite to those in the telencephalon. Moreover, in no case did administration of RU486 abolish these effects. These results suggest that the effects of cortisol on social status in rainbow trout may be mediated via the modulation of central signaling systems and subsequent changes in behaviour and/or competitive ability, although the exact site of action in the brain remains uncertain.

Key words: rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, cortisol, social status, monoamines, serotonin, dopamine, RU486




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. Ivanis, A. J. Esbaugh, and S. F. Perry
Branchial expression and localization of SLC9A2 and SLC9A3 sodium/hydrogen exchangers and their possible role in acid-base regulation in freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2467 - 2477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005