QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online June 16, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 2595-2609 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01659

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Secor, S. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Secor, S. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Physiological responses to feeding, fasting and estivation for anurans

Stephen M. Secor

Department of Physiology, University of California at Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1751, USA and ^*Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0344, USA

Accepted 25 April 2005

Anuran estivation is characterized by long episodes of aphagia. To investigate whether estivating anurans downregulate intestinal performance as an adaptive mechanism to reduce energy expenditure, I compared the metabolic and intestinal responses to feeding, fasting and estivation among non-estivating and estivating species of the anuran families Bufonidae, Leptodactylidae and Ranidae. Standard metabolic rates of the estivating Bufo alvarius, Ceratophrys ornata and Pyxicephalus adspersus were significantly less than those of the non-estivating Bufo marinus, Leptodactylus pentadactylus and Rana catesbeiana. Whereas the digestion of rodent meals equaling 15% of anuran body mass generated significant metabolic responses for all species, specific dynamic action was significantly greater for the estivating species. For estivating species, feeding triggered more than a doubling of small intestinal mass and significant upregulation of intestinal nutrient transport rates, resulting in six- to tenfold increases in total intestinal nutrient uptake capacity. The postprandial intestinal responses of the non-estivating species were much more modest, averaging a 50% increase in small intestinal mass and 69% increase in uptake capacities. Following 1 month of laboratory-induced estivation, C. ornata and P. adspersus had further depressed metabolic rates by 20%, intestinal masses by 44%, and total intestinal uptake capacities by 60%. In a fashion similar to infrequently feeding, sit-and-wait foraging snakes, estivating anurans possess the capacity to severely downregulate intestinal performance with fasting and estivation, and subsequently upregulate the gut with feeding. The depression in gut performance during estivation aids in reducing energy expenditure, thereby increasing the duration that the animal can remain dormant while relying solely upon stored energy.

Key words: anuran, Bufo, Ceratophrys, Leptodactylus, Pyxicephalus, Rana, estivation, fasting, intestinal nutrient transport, specific dynamic action

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

FASTING FROGS

Yfke van Bergen
JEB 2005 208: iii. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Cramp, S. M. Kayes, E. A. Meyer, and C. E. Franklin Ups and downs of intestinal function with prolonged fasting during aestivation in the burrowing frog, Cyclorana alboguttata J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2009; 212(22): 3656 - 3663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Naya, C. Veloso, P. Sabat, and F. Bozinovic The effect of short- and long-term fasting on digestive and metabolic flexibility in the Andean toad, Bufo spinulosus J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2009; 212(14): 2167 - 2175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Secor Digestive physiology of the Burmese python: broad regulation of integrated performance J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2008; 211(24): 3767 - 3774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Cox and S. M. Secor Matched regulation of gastrointestinal performance in the Burmese python, Python molurus J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2008; 211(7): 1131 - 1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Christel, D. F. DeNardo, and S. M. Secor Metabolic and digestive response to food ingestion in a binge-feeding lizard, the Gila monster (Heloderma suspectum) J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 210(19): 3430 - 3439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Starck, A. P. Cruz-Neto, and A. S. Abe Physiological and morphological responses to feeding in broad-nosed caiman (Caiman latirostris) J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2007; 210(12): 2033 - 2045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. D. Ott and S. M. Secor Adaptive regulation of digestive performance in the genus Python J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2007; 210(2): 340 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. van Bergen FASTING FROGS J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2005; 208(13): iii - iii. [Full Text] [PDF]