|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online June 6, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 2303-2318 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01612
The aerodynamics of hovering flight in Drosophila
1 Institute of Neuroinformatics, University/ETH Zürich,
Switzerland
2 California Institute of Technology, Mail Code 138-78, Pasadena, CA 91125,
USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: steven{at}ini.phys.ethz.ch)
Accepted 21 March 2005
Using 3D infrared high-speed video, we captured the continuous wing and body kinematics of free-flying fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, during hovering and slow forward flight. We then `replayed' the wing kinematics on a dynamically scaled robotic model to measure the aerodynamic forces produced by the wings. Hovering animals generate a U-shaped wing trajectory, in which large drag forces during a downward plunge at the start of each stroke create peak vertical forces. Quasi-steady mechanisms could account for nearly all of the mean measured force required to hover, although temporal discrepancies between instantaneous measured forces and model predictions indicate that unsteady mechanisms also play a significant role. We analyzed the requirements for hovering from an analysis of the time history of forces and moments in all six degrees of freedom. The wing kinematics necessary to generate sufficient lift are highly constrained by the requirement to balance thrust and pitch torque over the stroke cycle. We also compare the wing motion and aerodynamic forces of free and tethered flies. Tethering causes a strong distortion of the stroke pattern that results in a reduction of translational forces and a prominent nose-down pitch moment. The stereotyped distortion under tethered conditions is most likely due to a disruption of sensory feedback. Finally, we calculated flight power based directly on the measurements of wing motion and aerodynamic forces, which yielded a higher estimate of muscle power during free hovering flight than prior estimates based on time-averaged parameters. This discrepancy is mostly due to a two- to threefold underestimate of the mean profile drag coefficient in prior studies. We also compared our values with the predictions of the same time-averaged models using more accurate kinematic and aerodynamic input parameters based on our high-speed videography measurements. In this case, the time-averaged models tended to overestimate flight costs.
Key words: fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, flight, aerodynamics, power, biomechanics, behavior
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. H. Wu, Y. L. Zhang, and M. Sun Hovering of model insects: simulation by coupling equations of motion with Navier-Stokes equations J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2009; 212(20): 3313 - 3329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Zhao, Q. Huang, X. Deng, and S. P. Sane Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings J R Soc Interface, August 19, 2009; (2009) rsif.2009.0200v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Walker, A. L. R. Thomas, and G. K. Taylor Deformable wing kinematics in free-flying hoverflies J R Soc Interface, May 15, 2009; (2009) rsif.2009.0120v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. I. Fontaine, F. Zabala, M. H. Dickinson, and J. W. Burdick Wing and body motion during flight initiation in Drosophila revealed by automated visual tracking J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2009; 212(9): 1307 - 1323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Ristroph, G. J. Berman, A. J. Bergou, Z. J. Wang, and I. Cohen Automated hull reconstruction motion tracking (HRMT) applied to sideways maneuvers of free-flying insects J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2009; 212(9): 1324 - 1335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. N. Fry, N. Rohrseitz, A. D. Straw, and M. H. Dickinson Visual control of flight speed in Drosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2009; 212(8): 1120 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Liu and M. Sun Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of hovering droneflies J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2014 - 2025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. R. Frazier, J. F. Harrison, S. D. Kirkton, and S. P. Roberts Cold rearing improves cold-flight performance in Drosophila via changes in wing morphology J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2116 - 2122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Card and M. Dickinson Performance trade-offs in the flight initiation of Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): 341 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Aono, F. Liang, and H. Liu Near- and far-field aerodynamics in insect hovering flight: an integrated computational study J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 239 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Hesselberg and F.-O. Lehmann Turning behaviour depends on frictional damping in the fruit fly Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2007; 210(24): 4319 - 4334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Bender and M. H. Dickinson Visual stimulation of saccades in magnetically tethered Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2006; 209(16): 3170 - 3182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Gordon and M. H. Dickinson Role of calcium in the regulation of mechanical power in insect flight. PNAS, March 14, 2006; 103(11): 4311 - 4315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. L. Altshuler, W. B. Dickson, J. T. Vance, S. P. Roberts, and M. H. Dickinson Short-amplitude high-frequency wing strokes determine the aerodynamics of honeybee flight PNAS, December 13, 2005; 102(50): 18213 - 18218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
