|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online May 24, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 2037-2043 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01584
Olfactory discrimination of female reproductive status by male tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus)
1 Centro de Ciências do Mar, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de
Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
2 Departamento de Biologia, Universidade de Évora, Apartado 94,
7002-554 Évora, Portugal
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: phubbard{at}ualg.pt)
Accepted 9 March 2005
The current study investigated whether discrimination of sexual status of female tilapia by males is mediated by olfaction. Size-matched groups of female tilapia were assigned as pre- or post-ovulatory according to the time since their last ovulation (15-19 days pre-ovulatory, N=7; 1-3 days post-ovulatory, N=8). Female-conditioned water and body fluids (urine, bile, faeces and plasma) were assessed for olfactory potency in males by recording the electro-olfactogram (EOG). Water extracts, urine and faeces from pre-ovulatory females all evoked significantly larger amplitude EOGs in male fish (N=6), with correspondingly lower thresholds of detection, than those from post-ovulatory females. Plasma and bile evoked very large amplitude EOGs in males but with no differences between the two groups of females. Anosmic males (N=6) did not behave differently towards pre- or post-ovulatory females, while sham-operated males (N=6) showed a marked increase in urination rate towards pre-ovulatory females. We conclude that the ability of male tilapia to discriminate between females of differing reproductive status is mediated by odorants released into the water, probably via the urine and faeces, by pre-ovulatory females.
Key words: chemical communication, behaviour, reproduction, courtship, fish, cichlid, pheromone
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Huertas, L. Hagey, A. F. Hofmann, J. Cerda, A. V. M. Canario, and P. C. Hubbard Olfactory sensitivity to bile fluid and bile salts in the European eel (Anguilla anguilla), goldfish (Carassius auratus) and Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) suggests a `broad range' sensitivity not confined to those produced by conspecifics alone J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2010; 213(2): 308 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Hulsey Cichlid genomics and phenotypic diversity in a comparative context Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2009; 49(6): 618 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J.W Ward, M. M Webster, and P. J.B Hart Social recognition in wild fish populations Proc R Soc B, April 22, 2007; 274(1613): 1071 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lastein, E. H. Hamdani, and K. B. Doving Gender Distinction in Neural Discrimination of Sex Pheromones in the Olfactory Bulb of Crucian Carp, Carassius carassius Chem Senses, January 1, 2006; 31(1): 69 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. van Bergen SMELLS FISHY... J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2005; 208(11): iii - iii. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||