|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online May 5, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 1963-1970 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01555
Sources of mechanical power for uphill running in humans
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
* Author for correspondence at present address: Brown University, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, Box G-B205, Providence, RI 02912, USA (e-mail: Thomas_Roberts{at}Brown.edu)
Accepted 23 February 2005
During uphill running limb muscles must perform net mechanical work to increase the body's potential energy, while during level running the net mechanical work required is negligible as long as speed is constant. The increased demands for work as running incline increases might be met by an increase in power output at all joints, or only a subset of joints. We used inverse dynamics to determine which joints modulate net work output in humans running uphill. We measured joint kinematics and ground reaction force during moderate speed running at 0°, 6° and 12° inclines. Muscle force, joint power and work per step were determined at the ankle, knee and hip using inverse dynamics calculations. We found that virtually all of the increase in work output with increasing incline resulted from increases in net work done at the hip (-0.25±0.23 J kg-1, level, vs 0.88±0.10 J kg-1, 12° incline), while the knee and ankle performed similar functions at all inclines. The increase in work output at the hip resulted primarily from a large increase in average net muscle moment during stance (2.07±17.84 Nm, level, vs 87.30±13.89 Nm, 12° incline); joint excursion increased by only 20% (41.22±3.41°, level, vs 49.22±2.35°, 12° incline). The increase in hip muscle moment and power was associated with a poorer mechanical advantage for producing force against the ground. The increase in hip moment with running incline allows for the production of the power necessary to lift the body. This power may be developed by hip extensors or by transfer of power from muscles at other joints via biarticular muscles.
Key words: locomotion, biomechanics, muscle, power, mechanical advantage, recruitment, human
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. S. Sawicki and D. P. Ferris Mechanics and energetics of incline walking with robotic ankle exoskeletons J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2009; 212(1): 32 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. M. Carroll, D. V. Lee, and A. A. Biewener Differential muscle function between muscle synergists: long and lateral heads of the triceps in jumping and landing goats (Capra hircus) J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2008; 105(4): 1262 - 1273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. T. Richards The kinematic determinants of anuran swimming performance: an inverse and forward dynamics approach J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2008; 211(19): 3181 - 3194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Berg and A. A. Biewener Kinematics and power requirements of ascending and descending flight in the pigeon (Columba livia) J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2008; 211(7): 1120 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. R. Carrier, S. M. Deban, and T. Fischbein Locomotor function of forelimb protractor and retractor muscles of dogs: evidence of strut-like behavior at the shoulder J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2008; 211(1): 150 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. DeVita, J. Helseth, and T. Hortobagyi Muscles do more positive than negative work in human locomotion J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 210(19): 3361 - 3373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A. Biewener and M. A. Daley Unsteady locomotion: integrating muscle function with whole body dynamics and neuromuscular control J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 210(17): 2949 - 2960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. J. Roberts, B. K. Higginson, F. E. Nelson, and A. M. Gabaldon Muscle strain is modulated more with running slope than speed in wild turkey knee and hip extensors J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2007; 210(14): 2510 - 2517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. P. McGowan, R. V. Baudinette, and A. A. Biewener Modulation of proximal muscle function during level versus incline hopping in tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2007; 210(7): 1255 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Lichtwark and A. M. Wilson Interactions between the human gastrocnemius muscle and the Achilles tendon during incline, level and decline locomotion J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2006; 209(21): 4379 - 4388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Dutto, D. F. Hoyt, H. M. Clayton, E. A. Cogger, and S. J. Wickler Joint work and power for both the forelimb and hindlimb during trotting in the horse J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2006; 209(20): 3990 - 3999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Rubenson, H. T. Henry, P. M. Dimoulas, and R. L. Marsh The cost of running uphill: linking organismal and muscle energy use in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2006; 209(13): 2395 - 2408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. E. Lieberman, D. A. Raichlen, H. Pontzer, D. M. Bramble, and E. Cutright-Smith The human gluteus maximus and its role in running J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2006; 209(11): 2143 - 2155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
