|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online May 5, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 1867-1876 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01565
Timing of praying mantis evasive responses during simulated bat attack sequences
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
* Author for correspondence at present address: Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA (e-mail: biojdt{at}langate.gsu.edu)
Accepted 23 February 2005
Praying mantids perform evasive maneuvers that vary with the level of danger posed by their bat predators. The vocalization pattern of attacking bats provides cues that mantids can potentially use to decide how and when to respond. Using pulse trains simulating bat attack echolocation sequences, this study determines when in the attack sequence the mantis power dive (its response to high-level threat) occurs and predicts the parameters within the echolocation sequence that are important for eliciting the response. For sequences with a rapid transition from low to high pulse repetition rates (PRRs), the evasive response occurred close to the point during the simulated sequence when the bat would have contacted the mantis. However, the evasive response occurred earlier if the transition was gradual. Regardless of the transition type, the prediction data show that sequences trigger the response when PRRs reach 20-40 pulses s-1. These results suggest that a bat gradually increasing its PRR could `tip off' the mantis, enabling it to escape. Attack sequences contain gradual transitions when bats engage in strobing behavior, an echolocation phenomenon that may help the bat perceive the auditory scene. Conversely, bat attack sequences that contain rapid increases in PRR close to the point of capture could circumvent the mantid's auditory defense. Based on these findings, mantids as well as other insects could benefit from having a back-up defense response to offset any advantage the bat gains by rapidly switching from low to high PRRs.
Key words: mantis, bat, escape, insect, hearing
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Ghose, J. D. Triblehorn, K. Bohn, D. D. Yager, and C. F. Moss Behavioral responses of big brown bats to dives by praying mantises J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2009; 212(5): 693 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Triblehorn, K. Ghose, K. Bohn, C. F. Moss, and D. D. Yager Free-flight encounters between praying mantids (Parasphendale agrionina) and bats (Eptesicus fuscus) J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2008; 211(4): 555 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Fullard, J. M. Ratcliffe, and C. G. Christie Acoustic feature recognition in the dogbane tiger moth, Cycnia tenera J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2007; 210(14): 2481 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. D. Santer, F. C. Rind, R. Stafford, and P. J. Simmons Role of an Identified Looming-Sensitive Neuron in Triggering a Flying Locust's Escape J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3391 - 3400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Triblehorn and D. D. Yager Wind generated by an attacking bat: anemometric measurements and detection by the praying mantis cercal system J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2006; 209(8): 1430 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. van Bergen THE GREAT ESCAPE J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2005; 208(10): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
