|
| ![]() |
|
||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online May 5, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 1835-1847 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01580
Effects of size and behavior on aerial performance of two species of flying snakes (Chrysopelea)
Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jjsocha{at}midway.uchicago.edu)
Accepted 9 March 2005
Aerial locomotion in snakes (genus Chrysopelea) is kinematically distinct from any other type of gliding or powered flight, with prominent, high amplitude body undulations visually dominating the behavior. Because it is not known how flying snakes produce aerodynamic forces in flight, the factors that determine snake flight performance are not clear. In this study, the effects of size and behavior on aerial performance were examined both within a species (C. paradisi) and between two species (C. paradisi and C. ornata), using stepwise multiple regressions to identify relevant variables. Smaller C. paradisi traveled farther than larger snakes at lower sinking speeds, with trajectories that shallowed more quickly and reached lower minimum glide angles. Although wing loading increased faster than expected for isometric size increase, wing loading per se was not responsible for performance differences between large and small snakes. Snakes with higher interactions between relative undulation amplitude and body size transitioned out of the initial acceleration phase at higher airspeeds and sinking speeds, and attained higher maximum airspeeds and horizontal speeds; snakes that used higher average relative amplitudes transitioned out of the initial acceleration phase at higher horizontal speeds. Undulation frequency was not significantly related to any performance variable within C. paradisi and was not significantly different between the two species, suggesting that this variable (in contrast to relative undulation amplitude) may have a minor influence on the aerodynamic mechanism of force production in snake flight. C. paradisi and C. ornata differed significantly in most performance comparisons. C. ornata were more massive than C. paradisi at any given body length and in general exhibited poorer gliding performance than C. paradisi. This study contributes towards understanding how an unconventional body form and kinematics can produce a novel mode of aerial locomotion in a vertebrate glider.
Key words: snake, gliding, parachuting, performance, kinematics, behavior, scaling, Chrysopelea paradisi, Chrysopelea ornata
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. L. Bishop Aerodynamic force generation, performance and control of body orientation during gliding in sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps) J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 210(15): 2593 - 2606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Jayne and M. A. Riley Scaling of the axial morphology and gap-bridging ability of the brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2007; 210(7): 1148 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Socha Becoming airborne without legs: the kinematics of take-off in a flying snake, Chrysopelea paradisi J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2006; 209(17): 3358 - 3369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Bishop The relationship between 3-D kinematics and gliding performance in the southern flying squirrel, Glaucomys volans J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2006; 209(4): 689 - 701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wei SNAKES TAKE FLIGHT J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2005; 208(10): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Socha, T. O'Dempsey, and M. LaBarbera A 3-D kinematic analysis of gliding in a flying snake, Chrysopelea paradisi J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2005; 208(10): 1817 - 1833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||