spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Propose a Workshop for 2011 spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 5, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 1835-1847 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01580
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Socha, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by LaBarbera, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Socha, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by LaBarbera, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of size and behavior on aerial performance of two species of flying snakes (Chrysopelea)

John J. Socha* and Michael LaBarbera

Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jjsocha{at}midway.uchicago.edu)

Accepted 9 March 2005

Aerial locomotion in snakes (genus Chrysopelea) is kinematically distinct from any other type of gliding or powered flight, with prominent, high amplitude body undulations visually dominating the behavior. Because it is not known how flying snakes produce aerodynamic forces in flight, the factors that determine snake flight performance are not clear. In this study, the effects of size and behavior on aerial performance were examined both within a species (C. paradisi) and between two species (C. paradisi and C. ornata), using stepwise multiple regressions to identify relevant variables. Smaller C. paradisi traveled farther than larger snakes at lower sinking speeds, with trajectories that shallowed more quickly and reached lower minimum glide angles. Although wing loading increased faster than expected for isometric size increase, wing loading per se was not responsible for performance differences between large and small snakes. Snakes with higher interactions between relative undulation amplitude and body size transitioned out of the initial acceleration phase at higher airspeeds and sinking speeds, and attained higher maximum airspeeds and horizontal speeds; snakes that used higher average relative amplitudes transitioned out of the initial acceleration phase at higher horizontal speeds. Undulation frequency was not significantly related to any performance variable within C. paradisi and was not significantly different between the two species, suggesting that this variable (in contrast to relative undulation amplitude) may have a minor influence on the aerodynamic mechanism of force production in snake flight. C. paradisi and C. ornata differed significantly in most performance comparisons. C. ornata were more massive than C. paradisi at any given body length and in general exhibited poorer gliding performance than C. paradisi. This study contributes towards understanding how an unconventional body form and kinematics can produce a novel mode of aerial locomotion in a vertebrate glider.

Key words: snake, gliding, parachuting, performance, kinematics, behavior, scaling, Chrysopelea paradisi, Chrysopelea ornata


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. L. Bishop
Aerodynamic force generation, performance and control of body orientation during gliding in sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps)
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 210(15): 2593 - 2606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. C. Jayne and M. A. Riley
Scaling of the axial morphology and gap-bridging ability of the brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis
J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2007; 210(7): 1148 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. J. Socha
Becoming airborne without legs: the kinematics of take-off in a flying snake, Chrysopelea paradisi
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2006; 209(17): 3358 - 3369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. L. Bishop
The relationship between 3-D kinematics and gliding performance in the southern flying squirrel, Glaucomys volans
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2006; 209(4): 689 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. Wei
SNAKES TAKE FLIGHT
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2005; 208(10): i - i.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. J. Socha, T. O'Dempsey, and M. LaBarbera
A 3-D kinematic analysis of gliding in a flying snake, Chrysopelea paradisi
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2005; 208(10): 1817 - 1833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005