QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online May 5, 2005
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 1785-1792 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01585

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Heiling, A. M. Articles by Herberstein, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Heiling, A. M. Articles by Herberstein, M. E.

Colouration in crab spiders: substrate choice and prey attraction

Astrid M. Heiling^1,2,*, Lars Chittka³, Ken Cheng⁴ and Marie E. Herberstein¹

¹ Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, 2109 NSW Australia
² Institute of Zoology II, University of Erlangen, Staudtstrasse 5, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
³ School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
⁴ Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, North Ryde 2109, NSW Australia

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: astrid.heiling{at}univie.ac.at)

Accepted 10 March 2005

Australian crab spiders Thomisus spectabilis ambush pollinating insects, such as honeybees (Apis mellifera) on flowers, and can change their body colour between yellow and white. It is traditionally assumed that the spiders change their colour to match the flower colour, thus rendering them cryptic to insect prey. Here, we test this assumption combining state-of-the-art knowledge of bee vision and behavioural experiments.

In the field, yellow spiders are only found on yellow daisies (Chrysanthemum frutescens), whereas white spiders are found on yellow and white daisies. These field patterns were confirmed in the laboratory. When given the choice between white and yellow daisies, yellow spiders preferred yellow daisies, whereas white spiders showed only a slight but non-significant preference for white flowers. Thus, T. spectabilis select background colours according to their own body colour. When viewed from a distance, bees use an achromatic signal produced by their green receptors for target detection. Through this visual channel, white spiders on white flowers, and yellow spiders on yellow flowers are virtually undetectable. From a closer distance of a few centimetres, when bees evaluate colour contrast, the combination of spider colour against different flower backgrounds affected the response of honeybees, but not in ways predicted by a classical crypsis/conspicuousness interpretation. Yellow spiders on yellow flowers are not perfectly matched when interpreted through the colour vision of a honeybee. Nevertheless, honeybees showed indifference to the presence of a spider, equally landing on vacant or spider-occupied flowers. Likewise, white spiders are poorly hidden on white flowers, as white spiders reflect ultraviolet light strongly, while white flowers do not. Surprisingly, bees are attracted to this contrast, and significantly more honeybees preferred white flowers occupied by white spiders. White spiders on yellow flowers produce the highest colour contrast and bees again preferred spider-occupied flowers. Yellow spiders on white flowers were the only pairing where bees rejected spider-occupied flowers, especially in cases where the contrast between the two was relatively strong. Thus, T. spectabilis select flower colours adaptively in a way that deceives honeybees, or at least does not deter them.

Key words: Thomisus spectabilis, Apis mellifera, floral signal, communication, vision

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. C. Insausti and J. Casas The functional morphology of color changing in a spider: development of ommochrome pigment granules J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2008; 211(5): 780 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Reader, A. D. Higginson, C. J. Barnard, F. S. Gilbert, and The Behavioural Ecology Field Course The effects of predation risk from crab spiders on bee foraging behavior Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2006; 17(6): 933 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Hemmi, J. Marshall, W. Pix, M. Vorobyev, and J. Zeil The variable colours of the fiddler crab Uca vomeris and their relation to background and predation J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2006; 209(20): 4140 - 4153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I-M. Tso, C.-P. Liao, R.-P. Huang, and E.-C. Yang Function of being colorful in web spiders: attracting prey or camouflaging oneself? Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2006; 17(4): 606 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Heiling, K. Cheng, L. Chittka, A. Goeth, and M. E. Herberstein The role of UV in crab spider signals: effects on perception by prey and predators J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2005; 208(20): 3925 - 3931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]