|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online December 15, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 41-53 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01305
Joint work and power associated with acceleration and deceleration in tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii)
1 Concord Field Station, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
2 Department of Environmental Biology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA
5003, Australia
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: cmcgowan{at}oeb.harvard.edu)
Accepted 22 September 2004
Measurements of joint work and power were determined using inverse dynamics analysis based on ground reaction force and high-speed video recordings of tammar wallabies as they decelerated and accelerated while hopping over a force platform on level ground. Measurements were obtained over a range of accelerations ranging from -6 m s-2 to 8 m s-2. The goal of our study was to determine which joints are used to modulate mechanical power when tammar wallabies change speed. From these measurements, we also sought to determine which hind limb muscle groups are the most important for producing changes in mechanical work. Because our previous in vivo analyses of wallaby distal muscle function indicated that these muscle-tendon units favor elastic energy savings and perform little work during steady level and incline hopping, we hypothesized that proximal muscle groups operating at the hip and knee joint are most important for the modulation of mechanical work and power. Of the four hind limb joints examined, the ankle joint had the greatest influence on the total limb work, accounting for 89% of the variation observed with changing speed. The hip and metatarsophalageal (MP) joints also contributed to modulating whole limb work, but to a lesser degree than the ankle, accounting for 28% (energy production) and -24% (energy absorption) of the change in whole limb work versus acceleration, respectively. In contrast, the work produced at the knee joint was independent of acceleration. Based on the results of our previous in vivo studies and given that the magnitude of power produced at the ankle exceeds that which these muscles alone could produce, we conclude that the majority of power produced at the ankle joint is likely transferred from the hip and knee joints via proximal bi-articular muscles, operating in tandem with bi-articular ankle extensors, to power changes in hopping speed of tammar wallabies. Additionally, over the observed range of performance, peak joint moments at the ankle (and resulting tendon strains) did not increase significantly with acceleration, indicating that having thin tendons favoring elastic energy storage does not necessarily limit a tammar wallaby's ability to accelerate or decelerate.
Key words: locomotion, hopping, joint power, inverse dynamics, tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. B. Williams, H. Tan, J. R. Usherwood, and A. M. Wilson Pitch then power: limitations to acceleration in quadrupeds Biol Lett, October 23, 2009; 5(5): 610 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. M. Walter and D. R. Carrier Rapid acceleration in dogs: ground forces and body posture dynamics J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2009; 212(12): 1930 - 1939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Schilling, T. Fischbein, E. P. Yang, and D. R. Carrier Function of the extrinsic hindlimb muscles in trotting dogs J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2009; 212(7): 1036 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. B. Williams, J. R. Usherwood, K. Jespers, A. J. Channon, and A. M. Wilson Exploring the mechanical basis for acceleration: pelvic limb locomotor function during accelerations in racing greyhounds (Canis familiaris) J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2009; 212(4): 550 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. T. Richards The kinematic determinants of anuran swimming performance: an inverse and forward dynamics approach J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2008; 211(19): 3181 - 3194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. DeVita, J. Helseth, and T. Hortobagyi Muscles do more positive than negative work in human locomotion J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 210(19): 3361 - 3373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. P. McGowan, R. V. Baudinette, and A. A. Biewener Modulation of proximal muscle function during level versus incline hopping in tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2007; 210(7): 1255 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. Higham Feeding, fins and braking maneuvers: locomotion during prey capture in centrarchid fishes J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2007; 210(1): 107 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Dutto, D. F. Hoyt, H. M. Clayton, E. A. Cogger, and S. J. Wickler Joint work and power for both the forelimb and hindlimb during trotting in the horse J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2006; 209(20): 3990 - 3999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Robilliard and A. M. Wilson Prediction of kinetics and kinematics of running animals using an analytical approximation to the planar spring-mass system J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2005; 208(23): 4377 - 4389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. P. McGowan, R. V. Baudinette, J. R. Usherwood, and A. A. Biewener The mechanics of jumping versus steady hopping in yellow-footed rock wallabies J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2005; 208(14): 2741 - 2751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
