spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online December 15, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 113-127 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01345
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Herrel, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Herrel, A.

Prey capture kinematics of ant-eating lizards

Jay J. Meyers1,* and Anthony Herrel2

1 Physiology and Functional Morphology Group, Department of Biological Sciences Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5640, USA
2 Laboratory of Functional Morphology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium B-2610

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jjm{at}dana.ucc.nau.edu)

Accepted 13 October 2004

While morphological and behavioral feeding specializations are obvious in many vertebrate groups, among lizards there appear to be few dietary specialists. By comparing the prey capture kinematics and overall feeding behavior in two highly specialized ant-eating lizards (Moloch horridus and Phrynosoma platyrhinos) with those of two closely related dietary generalists (Pogona vitticeps and Uma notata), we investigate whether dietary specialization has been accompanied by changes in the function and use of the feeding system. We quantified kinematic variables from high-speed video recordings (200-250 frames s-1) of each species feeding on ants. Prey capture was strikingly different in M. horridus to that of other species, being characterized by a suite of unusual behaviors including the lack of a body lunge, faster tongue protrusion, reduced prey processing and, most notably, the ability to modulate the slow open phase of the gape cycle. In concert, these traits make a single feeding event in M. horridus faster than that in any other iguanian lizard studied to date. Prey capture behavior in P. platyrhinos is kinematically more similar to U. notata and P. vitticeps than to M. horridus, but the ant specialists are similar in that both lack distinct prey processing behaviors, resulting in faster overall capture and feeding events. While ant feeding in P. vitticeps is faster than feeding on other prey, the duration of a single feeding event is still four times longer than in either ant specialist, because of extensive prey processing. Additionally, a phylogenetic comparison of ant specialist lizards with dietary generalists revealed that ant-eating lizards require significantly less time to capture and process prey. Thus there are not only significant behavioral modifications in these ant-eating lizards, but also multiple strategies among specialists, suggesting differing selective pressures or phylogenetic constraints in the evolution of ant eating in lizards.

Key words: lizard, iguania, prey capture, feeding, ant eating, myrmecophagy, Moloch, Phrynosoma, Pogona, Uma


Related articles in JEB:

FAST FOOD
Yfke van Bergen
JEB 2005 208: i. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
V. Schaerlaeken, A. Herrel, and J. J. Meyers
Modulation, individual variation and the role of lingual sensory afferents in the control of prey transport in the lizard Pogona vitticeps
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2071 - 2078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. J. Clark and A. P. Summers
Morphology and kinematics of feeding in hagfish: possible functional advantages of jaws
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2007; 210(22): 3897 - 3909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
T. E. Higham
The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: Morphology, behavior, and performance
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 82 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
A. Herrel, V. Schaerlaeken, J. J. Meyers, K. A. Metzger, and C. F. Ross
The evolution of cranial design and performance in squamates: Consequences of skull-bone reduction on feeding behavior
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 107 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. N. Patek, J. E. Baio, B. L. Fisher, and A. V. Suarez
Multifunctionality and mechanical origins: Ballistic jaw propulsion in trap-jaw ants
PNAS, August 22, 2006; 103(34): 12787 - 12792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Y. van Bergen
FAST FOOD
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2005; 208(1): i - i.
[Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005