|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online March 22, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1585-1596 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00922
The hydrodynamic trails of Lepomis gibbosus (Centrarchidae), Colomesus psittacus (Tetraodontidae) and Thysochromis ansorgii (Cichlidae) investigated with scanning particle image velocimetry
Institut für Zoologie der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Poppelsdorfer Schloß, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
* Author for correspondence at present address: Allgemeine Zoologie und Neurobiologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, ND 6/33, 44780 Bochum, Germany (e-mail: hanke{at}neurobiologie.ruhr-uni-bochum.de)
Accepted 4 February 2004
The hydrodynamic trails of fish belonging to the families Centrarchidae, Tetraodontidae and Cichlidae were investigated. Water movements were measured in six horizontal planes, spaced 1012 mm apart, for up to 5 min after the passage of a fish, using a computer controlled array of modulated laser diodes. We measured continuously and non-continuously swimming fish. Water velocities decayed rapidly in the leading seconds after the passage of a fish, but could still be measured for a period considerably longer than that. In still water (median water velocity <0.5 mm s1), the hydrodynamic trails of Lepomis gibbosus lasted for more than 5 min. The trails of Colomesus psittacus and Thysochromis ansorgii could be detected for more than 30 s and more than 3 min, respectively. The water disturbance left behind by these fish was sufficient to be sensed by a piscivorous predator at a distance where vision or hearing frequently fail. Acoustic stimuli estimated from a dipole model in a distance that would be covered by the tested fish in 1 min (425 m) were 1.5x107 to 3.1x1010 m s2, while the hearing threshold of a perch is three orders of magnitude above that. By contrast, the fish wakes after 1 min (except for one Colomesus wake) contained water velocities between 0.95 and 2.05 mm s1, which are within the detection range of hydrodynamic sensory systems. The three species differed with respect to water velocities, the spatial extent of the fish-generated water disturbances and the structure of the wake.
Key words: wake following, lateral line, hydrodynamic reception, particle image velocimetry (PIV), Lepomis, Colomesus, Thysochromis
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. D. Tytell and G. V. Lauder Hydrodynamics of the escape response in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2008; 211(21): 3359 - 3369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Schulte-Pelkum, S. Wieskotten, W. Hanke, G. Dehnhardt, and B. Mauck Tracking of biogenic hydrodynamic trails in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2007; 210(5): 781 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Chagnaud, H. Bleckmann, and J. Engelmann Neural responses of goldfish lateral line afferents to vortex motions J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2006; 209(2): 327 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Palmer, M. Deffenbaugh, and A. F. Mensinger Sensitivity of the anterior lateral line to natural stimuli in the oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau (Linnaeus) J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): 3441 - 3450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||