|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online March 9, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1345-1352 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00889
Take-off mechanics in hummingbirds (Trochilidae)
1 Department of Biology, University of Portland, 5000 North Willamette
Boulevard, Portland, OR 97203, USA
2 Bioengineering 138-78, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East
California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
3 Biology Department, George Fox University, 414 N. Meridian Street,
Newberg, OR 97132, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: tobalske{at}up.edu)
Accepted 21 January 2004
Initiating flight is challenging, and considerable effort has focused on understanding the energetics and aerodynamics of take-off for both machines and animals. For animal flight, the available evidence suggests that birds maximize their initial flight velocity using leg thrust rather than wing flapping. The smallest birds, hummingbirds (Order Apodiformes), are unique in their ability to perform sustained hovering but have proportionally small hindlimbs that could hinder generation of high leg thrust. Understanding the take-off flight of hummingbirds can provide novel insight into the take-off mechanics that will be required for micro-air vehicles. During take-off by hummingbirds, we measured hindlimb forces on a perch mounted with strain gauges and filmed wingbeat kinematics with high-speed video. Whereas other birds obtain 8090% of their initial flight velocity using leg thrust, the leg contribution in hummingbirds was 59% during autonomous take-off. Unlike other species, hummingbirds beat their wings several times as they thrust using their hindlimbs. In a phylogenetic context, our results show that reduced body and hindlimb size in hummingbirds limits their peak acceleration during leg thrust and, ultimately, their take-off velocity. Previously, the influence of motivational state on take-off flight performance has not been investigated for any one organism. We studied the full range of motivational states by testing performance as the birds took off: (1) to initiate flight autonomously, (2) to escape a startling stimulus or (3) to aggressively chase a conspecific away from a feeder. Motivation affected performance. Escape and aggressive take-off featured decreased hindlimb contribution (46% and 47%, respectively) and increased flight velocity. When escaping, hummingbirds foreshortened their body movement prior to onset of leg thrust and began beating their wings earlier and at higher frequency. Thus, hummingbirds are capable of modulating their leg and wingbeat kinetics to increase take-off velocity.
Key words: rufous hummingbird, Selasphorus rufus, force, perch, velocity, kinematics, flight
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Hingee and R. D. Magrath Flights of fear: a mechanical wing whistle sounds the alarm in a flocking bird Proc R Soc B, December 7, 2009; 276(1676): 4173 - 4179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Clark Courtship dives of Anna's hummingbird offer insights into flight performance limits Proc R Soc B, September 7, 2009; 276(1670): 3047 - 3052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Card and M. Dickinson Performance trade-offs in the flight initiation of Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): 341 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W. Tobalske Biomechanics of bird flight J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3135 - 3146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Socha Becoming airborne without legs: the kinematics of take-off in a flying snake, Chrysopelea paradisi J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2006; 209(17): 3358 - 3369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||