|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online February 20, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1085-1091 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00865
Does she smell like a queen? Chemoreception of a cuticular hydrocarbon signal in the ant Pachycondyla inversa
1 Department of Zoology, University of Regensburg, Universitaetsstrasse 31,
93040 Regensburg, Germany
2 Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Hamburg,
Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
3 Department of Experimental Ecology, University of Ulm,
Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89069 Ulm, Germany
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: patrizia.dettorre{at}biologie.uni-regensburg.de)
Accepted 5 January 2004
Primitive ant societies, with their relatively simple social structure, provide an opportunity to explore the evolution of chemical communication, in particular of mechanisms underlying within-colony discrimination. In the same colony, slight differences in individual odours can be the basis for discrimination between different castes, classes of age and social status. There is some evidence from correlative studies that such inter-individual variation is associated with differences in reproductive status, but direct proof that certain chemical compounds are detected and recognized by ants is still lacking. In the ponerine ant Pachycondyla inversa, fertile queens and, in orphaned colonies, dominant egg-laying workers are characterized by the predominance of a branched hydrocarbon, 3,11-dimethylheptacosane (3,11-diMeC27) on the cuticle. Using electroanntennography and gas chromatography with electroantennographic detection, we show that the antennae of P. inversa workers react to this key compound. 3,11-diMeC27 is correlated with ovarian activity and, because it is detected, is likely to assume the role of a fertility signal reflecting the quality of the sender.
Key words: chemical communication, fertility signal, 3,11-dimethylheptacosane, electroantennographic detection, ant, Pachycondyla inversa
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Hanus, V. Vrkoslav, I. Hrdy, J. Cvacka, and J. Sobotnik Beyond cuticular hydrocarbons: evidence of proteinaceous secretion specific to termite kings and queens Proc R Soc B, November 25, 2009; (2009) rspb.2009.1857v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Guerrieri, V. Nehring, C. G. Jorgensen, J. Nielsen, C. G. Galizia, and P. d'Ettorre Ants recognize foes and not friends Proc R Soc B, July 7, 2009; 276(1666): 2461 - 2468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Heinze and P. d'Ettorre Honest and dishonest communication in social Hymenoptera J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2009; 212(12): 1775 - 1779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Amsalem, R. Twele, W. Francke, and A. Hefetz Reproductive competition in the bumble-bee Bombus terrestris: do workers advertise sterility? Proc R Soc B, April 7, 2009; 276(1660): 1295 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||