QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online February 6, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 993-1004 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00850

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Roberts, S. P. Articles by Dudley, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Roberts, S. P. Articles by Dudley, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Allometry of kinematics and energetics in carpenter bees (Xylocopa varipuncta) hovering in variable-density gases

Stephen P. Roberts^1,*, Jon F. Harrison² and Robert Dudley^3,4

¹ Department of Biological Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4004, USA
² School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1501, USA
³ Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140, USA
⁴ Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, PO Box 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: sroberts{at}ccmail.nevada.edu)

Accepted 28 December 2003

We assessed the energetic and aerodynamic limits of hovering flight in the carpenter bee Xylocopa varipuncta. Using normoxic, variable-density mixtures of O₂, N₂ and He, we were able to elicit maximal hovering performance and aerodynamic failure in the majority of bees sampled. Bees were not isometric regarding thorax mass and wing area, both of which were disproportionately lower in heavier individuals. The minimal gas density necessary for hovering (MGD) increased with body mass and decreased with relative thoracic muscle mass. Only the four bees in our sample with the highest body mass-specific thorax masses were able to hover in pure heliox. Wingbeat frequency and stroke amplitude during maximal hovering were significantly greater than in normodense hovering, increased significantly with body mass during normodense hovering but were mass independent during maximal hovering. Reserve capacity for wingbeat frequency and stroke amplitude decreased significantly with increasing body mass, although reserve capacity in stroke amplitude (10–30%) exceeded that of wingbeat frequency (0–8%). Stroke plane angle during normodense hovering was significantly greater than during maximal hovering, whereas body angle was significantly greater during maximal hovering than during normodense hovering. Power production during normodense hovering was significantly less than during maximal hovering. Metabolic rates were significantly greater during maximal hovering than during normodense hovering and were inversely related to body mass during maximal and normodense hovering. Metabolic reserve capacity averaged 34% and was independent of body mass. Muscle efficiencies were slightly higher during normodense hovering. The allometry of power production, power reserve capacity and muscle efficiency were dependent on the assumed coefficient of drag (C_D), with significant allometries most often at lower values of C_D. Larger bees operate near the envelope of maximal performance even in normodense hovering due to smaller body mass-specific flight muscles and limited reserve capacities for kinematics and power production.

Key words: aerodynamics, allometry, energetics, flight, reserve capacity, Xylocopa, bee

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Buchwald and R. Dudley Limits to vertical force and power production in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Bombus impatiens) J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2010; 213(3): 426 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Vance, J. B. Williams, M. M. Elekonich, and S. P. Roberts The effects of age and behavioral development on honey bee (Apis mellifera) flight performance J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2009; 212(16): 2604 - 2611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Swartz, K. S. Breuer, and D. J. Willis Aeromechanics in aeroecology: flight biology in the aerosphere Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 85 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Frazier, J. F. Harrison, S. D. Kirkton, and S. P. Roberts Cold rearing improves cold-flight performance in Drosophila via changes in wing morphology J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2116 - 2122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Altshuler, W. B. Dickson, J. T. Vance, S. P. Roberts, and M. H. Dickinson Short-amplitude high-frequency wing strokes determine the aerodynamics of honeybee flight PNAS, December 13, 2005; 102(50): 18213 - 18218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E Niven and J. P.W Scharlemann Do insect metabolic rates at rest and during flight scale with body mass? Biol Lett, September 22, 2005; 1(3): 346 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]