spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online February 6, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 993-1004 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00850
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, R.

Allometry of kinematics and energetics in carpenter bees (Xylocopa varipuncta) hovering in variable-density gases

Stephen P. Roberts1,*, Jon F. Harrison2 and Robert Dudley3,4

1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4004, USA
2 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1501, USA
3 Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140, USA
4 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, PO Box 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: sroberts{at}ccmail.nevada.edu)

Accepted 28 December 2003

We assessed the energetic and aerodynamic limits of hovering flight in the carpenter bee Xylocopa varipuncta. Using normoxic, variable-density mixtures of O2, N2 and He, we were able to elicit maximal hovering performance and aerodynamic failure in the majority of bees sampled. Bees were not isometric regarding thorax mass and wing area, both of which were disproportionately lower in heavier individuals. The minimal gas density necessary for hovering (MGD) increased with body mass and decreased with relative thoracic muscle mass. Only the four bees in our sample with the highest body mass-specific thorax masses were able to hover in pure heliox. Wingbeat frequency and stroke amplitude during maximal hovering were significantly greater than in normodense hovering, increased significantly with body mass during normodense hovering but were mass independent during maximal hovering. Reserve capacity for wingbeat frequency and stroke amplitude decreased significantly with increasing body mass, although reserve capacity in stroke amplitude (10–30%) exceeded that of wingbeat frequency (0–8%). Stroke plane angle during normodense hovering was significantly greater than during maximal hovering, whereas body angle was significantly greater during maximal hovering than during normodense hovering. Power production during normodense hovering was significantly less than during maximal hovering. Metabolic rates were significantly greater during maximal hovering than during normodense hovering and were inversely related to body mass during maximal and normodense hovering. Metabolic reserve capacity averaged 34% and was independent of body mass. Muscle efficiencies were slightly higher during normodense hovering. The allometry of power production, power reserve capacity and muscle efficiency were dependent on the assumed coefficient of drag (CD), with significant allometries most often at lower values of CD. Larger bees operate near the envelope of maximal performance even in normodense hovering due to smaller body mass-specific flight muscles and limited reserve capacities for kinematics and power production.

Key words: aerodynamics, allometry, energetics, flight, reserve capacity, Xylocopa, bee




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
S. M. Swartz, K. S. Breuer, and D. J. Willis
Aeromechanics in aeroecology: flight biology in the aerosphere
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 85 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. R. Frazier, J. F. Harrison, S. D. Kirkton, and S. P. Roberts
Cold rearing improves cold-flight performance in Drosophila via changes in wing morphology
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2116 - 2122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. L. Altshuler, W. B. Dickson, J. T. Vance, S. P. Roberts, and M. H. Dickinson
Short-amplitude high-frequency wing strokes determine the aerodynamics of honeybee flight
PNAS, December 13, 2005; 102(50): 18213 - 18218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004