QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online February 6, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 955-961 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00854

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Webb, P. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Webb, P. W.

Response latencies to postural disturbances in three species of teleostean fishes

Paul W. Webb

School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1115, USA

(e-mail: pwebb{at}umich.edu)

Accepted 28 December 2003

Flow in aquatic systems is characterized by unsteadiness that creates destabilizing perturbations. Appropriate correction responses depend on response latency. The time between a disturbance induced by either removal of a flow refuge or striking various parts of the body with a narrow water jet was measured for three species, chosen as examples of modes in teleostean body/fin organization that are expected to affect stability. Creek chub Semotilus atromaculatus is representative of fusiform-bodied soft-rayed teleosts, smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu of fusiform-bodied spiny-rayed forms and bluegill Lepomis macrochirus of deep-bodied spiny-rayed forms. Observations were made at 23°C. Loss of refuge resulted in a surge that fish corrected by starting to swim within 129±29 ms (mean ± 2 S.E.M.) for chub, which was significantly shorter than minimal times of approximately 200 ms for bluegill and bass. Slips and heaves induced by water jets initially resulted in extension of the median and paired fins that would damp growth of the disturbance, but otherwise these disturbances were ignored. Yaws and pitches were more likely to cause fish to swim away from the stimulus, making corrections as they did so. There were no differences in latencies for slip, heave, yaw and pitch disturbances within each species, but latencies varied among species. For these disturbances, responses averaged 123±19 ms for chub, again significantly smaller than those of 201±24 ms for bass and 208±52 ms for bluegill. Values for the two centrarchids were not significantly different (P>0.08). The response latency for rolling disturbances did not differ among species but was significantly smaller than that for other disturbances, with an overall latency of 70±15 ms. The greater responsiveness to hydrostatic rolling instability is attributed to functions requiring an upright posture and differences among species in habitat preferences.

Key words: teleost fish, body/fin organization, posture, response latency, stability

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. M. Standen and G. V. Lauder Hydrodynamic function of dorsal and anal fins in brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2007; 210(2): 325 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Liao The role of the lateral line and vision on body kinematics and hydrodynamic preference of rainbow trout in turbulent flow J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2006; 209(20): 4077 - 4090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Standen and G. V. Lauder Dorsal and anal fin function in bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus: three-dimensional kinematics during propulsion and maneuvering J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2005; 208(14): 2753 - 2763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Liao Neuromuscular control of trout swimming in a vortex street: implications for energy economy during the Karman gait J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2004; 207(20): 3495 - 3506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]