QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online January 27, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 803-811 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00840

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bailey, W. J. Articles by Hammond, T. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bailey, W. J. Articles by Hammond, T. J.

Female reply strategies in a duetting Australian bushcricket, Caedicia sp. (Phaneropterinae: Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera)

Winston J. Bailey^* and Thomas J. Hammond

School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: wbailey{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au)

Accepted 15 December 2003

Duetting is common between the sexes of phaneropterine bushcrickets (Phaneropterinae: Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera). In this paper we describe the complex duet of an undescribed Australian species within the genus Caedicia. The male's call consists of three parts, of which the final part contains information of the species' identity and most reliably elicits the female's response. The timing of her reply usually occurs within a period of about 1 s after the male has completed his signal but may also start during the male's call. Females reply with brief clicks ranging from 1 to >10, adjusting this reply number to changes in male call duration and intensity. By using computer-synthesised calls, we discovered that the female times her reply both from cues within the male call, when she starts the reply before its conclusion, and from the end of the call, in the case where the reply follows the male call. As the number of clicks in the reply increases so the interval between clicks decreases; the female fits her entire reply within a critical time window following the male's call. The male call intensity had a marginal effect on female reply strategy. We suggest a model based on levels of female motivation, by which females may set the number of clicks in reply as well as the reply latency.

Key words: duet, acoustic behaviour, reply strategy, bushcricket, Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera