QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online January 27, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 715-722 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00809

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kirifides, M. L. Articles by Bryant, B. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kirifides, M. L. Articles by Bryant, B. P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Calcium responses of chicken trigeminal ganglion neurons to methyl anthranilate and capsaicin

Michael L. Kirifides¹, Michael P. Kurnellas¹, Larry Clark² and Bruce P. Bryant^1,*

¹ Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA
² United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 La Porte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521-2154, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: bryant{at}monell.org)

Accepted 19 November 2003

Using digital fluorescence imaging, we determined the effects of methyl anthranilate (MA), an avian irritant, and capsaicin (CAP), a mammalian irritant, on intracellular calcium ([Ca²⁺]_i) in chicken trigeminal neurons. Concentration–response functions indicated that the threshold for inducing increases in [Ca²⁺]_i was higher for CAP (30 µmol l^–1) than for MA (10 µmol l^–1). The maximum magnitudes of [Ca²⁺]_i in response to MA and CAP were compared after normalization to 40 mmol l^–1 KCl. At equal concentrations (300 µmol l^–1), trigeminal neurons responded with a greater change in [Ca²⁺]_i to MA (78% of KCl) than to CAP (43% of KCl). Furthermore, at 300 µmol l^–1, 48% of neurons responded to MA whereas only 16% responded to CAP. The increases in [Ca²⁺]_i induced by both MA and CAP were dependent upon extracellular calcium. While the calcium responses to MA were also dependent on extracellular sodium, responses to CAP were not. There were separate but overlapping populations of neurons sensitive to MA and CAP. Taken together, the higher threshold concentration of CAP, the higher response magnitude to MA than CAP and the greater number of neurons sensitive to MA than CAP provide a rationale for the observed behavioral differences of birds to these two compounds. Finally, the findings that the calcium responses to MA and CAP have different ion dependencies and that there are separate populations sensitive to these compounds suggest different transduction mechanisms mediating chicken trigeminal responses to MA and CAP.

Key words: calcium imaging, capsaicin, chick, digital fluorescence imaging, Fura Red, irritation, methyl anthranilate, pain, primary cell culture, trigeminal neuron, repellent

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

GRAPES' SWEET PAIN

Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2004 207: 709-710. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. E. Conner, K. M. Alley, J. R. Barry, and A. E. Harper Has Vertebrate Chemesthesis Been a Selective Agent in the Evolution of Arthropod Chemical Defenses? Biol. Bull., December 1, 2007; 213(3): 267 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. P. Bryant Mechanisms of Somatosensory Neuronal Sensitivity to Alkaline pH Chem Senses, January 1, 2005; 30(suppl_1): i196 - i197. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Phillips GRAPES' SWEET PAIN J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2004; 207(5): 709 - 710. [Full Text] [PDF]