QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online January 12, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 667-674 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00808

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dutto, D. J. Articles by Wickler, S. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dutto, D. J. Articles by Wickler, S. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Moments and power generated by the horse (Equus caballus) hind limb during jumping

Darren J. Dutto^1,*, Donald F. Hoyt², Hilary M. Clayton³, Edward A. Cogger⁴ and Steven J. Wickler⁴

¹ Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768, USA
² Department of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768, USA
³ College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
⁴ Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ddutto{at}csupomona.edu)

Accepted 17 November 2003

The ability to jump over an obstacle depends upon the generation of work across the joints of the propelling limb(s). The total work generated by one hind limb of a horse and the contribution to the total work by four joints of the hind limb were determined for a jump. It was hypothesized that the hip and ankle joints would have extensor moments performing positive work, while the knee would have a flexor moment and perform negative work during the jump. Ground reaction forces and sagittal plane kinematics were simultaneously recorded during each jumping trial. Joint moment, power and work were determined for the metatarsophalangeal (MP), tarsal (ankle), tibiofemoral (knee) and coxofemoral (hip) joints. The hip, knee and ankle all flexed and then extended and the MP extended and then flexed during ground contact. Consistent with our hypothesis, large extensor moments were observed at the hip and ankle joints and large flexor moments at the knee and MP joints throughout ground contact of the hind limb. Peak moments tended to occur earlier in stance in the proximal joints but peak power generation of the hind limb joints occurred at similar times except for the MP joint, with the hip and ankle peaking first followed by the MP joint. During the first portion of ground contact (40%), the net result of the joint powers was the absorption of power. During the remainder of the contact period, the hind limb generated power. This pattern of power absorption followed by power generation paralleled the power profiles of the hip, ankle and MP joints. The total work performed by one hind limb was 0.71 J kg^-1. Surprisingly, the knee produced 85% of the work (0.60 J kg^-1) done by the hind limb, and the positive work performed by the knee occurred during the first 40% of the take-off. There is little net work generated by the other three joints over the entire take-off. Velocity of the tuber coxae (a landmark on the pelvis of the animal) was negative (downward) during the first 40% of stance, which perhaps reflects the negative work performed to decrease the potential energy during the first 40% of contact. During the final 60% of contact, the hip, ankle and MP joints generate positive work, which is reflected in the increase of the animal's potential energy.

Key words: horse, jumping, hind limb, knee joint, work, power, moment, ground reaction force, sagittal plane kinematics

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. B. Williams, J. R. Usherwood, K. Jespers, A. J. Channon, and A. M. Wilson Exploring the mechanical basis for acceleration: pelvic limb locomotor function during accelerations in racing greyhounds (Canis familiaris) J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2009; 212(4): 550 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Jayne and M. A. Riley Scaling of the axial morphology and gap-bridging ability of the brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2007; 210(7): 1148 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Dutto, D. F. Hoyt, H. M. Clayton, E. A. Cogger, and S. J. Wickler Joint work and power for both the forelimb and hindlimb during trotting in the horse J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2006; 209(20): 3990 - 3999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. P. McGowan, R. V. Baudinette, J. R. Usherwood, and A. A. Biewener The mechanics of jumping versus steady hopping in yellow-footed rock wallabies J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2005; 208(14): 2741 - 2751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. F. Hoyt, S. J. Wickler, A. A. Biewener, E. A. Cogger, and K. L. De La Paz In vivo muscle function vs speed I. Muscle strain in relation to length change of the muscle-tendon unit J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2005; 208(6): 1175 - 1190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Bobbert and S. Santamaria Contribution of the forelimbs and hindlimbs of the horse to mechanical energy changes in jumping J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2005; 208(2): 249 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. P. McGowan, R. V. Baudinette, and A. A. Biewener Joint work and power associated with acceleration and deceleration in tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2005; 208(1): 41 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]