QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online December 22, 2003
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 535-544 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00789

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schriefer, J. E. Articles by Hale, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schriefer, J. E. Articles by Hale, M. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Strikes and startles of northern pike (Esox lucius): a comparison of muscle activity and kinematics between S-start behaviors

Julie E. Schriefer¹ and Melina E. Hale^1,2,3,*

¹ Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
² Committee on Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
³ Committee on Computational Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: mhale{at}uchicago.edu)

Accepted 7 November 2003

S-starts are a major class of fast-start behaviors that serve diverse locomotor functions in fishes, playing roles in both feeding strike and escape startle events. While movement patterns are similar during strike and startle, their motor control mechanisms have not been compared. To investigate heterogeneity in S-start responses and to test the hypothesis that S-starts are generated by the same patterns of muscle activity regardless of the behavioral context in which they function, we examined kinematic and muscle activity patterns of northern pike (Esox lucius) performing feeding and escape S-starts. Movements were recorded with high-speed video (250 Hz). Muscle activity was recorded from seven electrodes, one in the left adductor mandibulae and bilaterally in the anterior, midbody and posterior epaxial white muscle. Although S-shaped movements are produced in both feeding and escape, kinematics and electromyogram (EMG) patterns differ. Stage 1 (pre-propulsive movement) is significantly slower and more variable during feeding strikes and involves caudal bending with less rostral movement than recorded for startle behaviors. Correspondingly, there is strong caudal muscle activity prior to rostral activity during strikes, whereas in startles caudal muscle activity had near simultaneous onset with contralateral rostral activity. Onset of jaw muscle activity occurred significantly after the onset of axial muscle activity during feeding strikes. By contrast, during startles, jaw activity onset was nearly simultaneous with the onset of axial muscle activity. Stage 2 kinematics generally did not differ between the strike and startle; however, EMGs indicate that stage 2 movements are generated by different patterns of muscle activity for the two behaviors. Although strikes and startles are similar in their propulsive performance, they appear to be initiated and driven by fundamentally different motor control mechanisms. We suggest that S-start startle behavior is mediated by a simple system of descending reticulospinal input to spinal neurons while the S-start strike involves a more complex neural circuit, allowing greater modulation of stage 1 movements while maintaining high stage 2 performance.

Key words: Esox lucius, pike, strike, startle, prey capture, fast-start, S-start

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. W. Blake and K. H. S. Chan Swimming in the upside down catfish Synodontis nigriventris: it matters which way is up J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 210(17): 2979 - 2989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Higham The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: Morphology, behavior, and performance Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 82 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Wohl and S. Schuster The predictive start of hunting archer fish: a flexible and precise motor pattern performed with the kinematics of an escape C-start J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2007; 210(2): 311 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Rice and M. W. Westneat Coordination of feeding, locomotor and visual systems in parrotfishes (Teleostei: Labridae) J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): 3503 - 3518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. S. Bierman, J. E. Schriefer, S. J. Zottoli, and M. E. Hale The effects of head and tail stimulation on the withdrawal startle response of the rope fish (Erpetoichthys calabaricus) J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2004; 207(22): 3985 - 3997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]