QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online December 22, 2003
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 443-448 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00768

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brumm, H. Articles by Todt, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brumm, H. Articles by Todt, D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey

Henrik Brumm^*, Katrin Voss, Ireen Köllmer and Dietmar Todt

Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Biologie, Verhaltensbiologie, Haderslebener Str. 9, 12163 Berlin, Germany

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: brumm{at}zedat.fu-berlin.de)

Accepted 27 October 2003

This study on common marmosets Callithrix jacchus is the first to examine noise-dependent mechanisms of vocal plasticity in a New World monkey. Since acoustic communication can be considerably impaired by environmental noise, some animals have evolved adaptations to counteract its masking effects. The studied marmosets increased the sound level of their spontaneous calls in response to increased levels of white noise broadcast to them. Possibly, such noise-dependent adjustment of vocal amplitude serves to maintain a specific signal-to-noise ratio that is favourable for signal production. Concurrently, the adjustment of vocal amplitude can maintain a given active space for communication. In contrast to some bird species, no noise-induced increase in the number of syllables per call series could be found, showing that an increased serial redundancy of vocal signals was not used to communicate under noisy conditions. Finally, we examined a possible noise-dependent prolongation of vocal signals. This approach was guided by the findings of perceptional studies, which suggest an increased detection probability of prolonged signals in noise by temporal summation. Marmosets indeed increased the duration of their call syllables along with increasing background noise levels. This is the first evidence of such mechanism of vocal plasticity in an animal communication system.

Key words: acoustic communication, environmental noise, signal masking, vocal plasticity, Lombard effect, common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. J Ord, R. A Peters, B. Clucas, and J. A Stamps Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats Proc R Soc B, April 22, 2007; 274(1613): 1057 - 1062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Peters and C. S. Evans Active space of a movement-based signal: response to the Jacky dragon (Amphibolurus muricatus) display is sensitive to distance, but independent of orientation J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2007; 210(3): 395 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. R. Egnor, C. G. Iguina, and M. D. Hauser Perturbation of auditory feedback causes systematic perturbation in vocal structure in adult cotton-top tamarins J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3652 - 3663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Eliades and X. Wang Dynamics of Auditory-Vocal Interaction in Monkey Auditory Cortex Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1510 - 1523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Witte, H. E. Farris, M. J. Ryan, and W. Wilczynski How cricket frog females deal with a noisy world: habitat-related differences in auditory tuning Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2005; 16(3): 571 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L Leonard and A. G Horn Ambient noise and the design of begging signals Proc R Soc B, March 22, 2005; 272(1563): 651 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]