spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online December 22, 2003
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 393-398 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00771
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graham, P.
Right arrow Articles by Collett, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graham, P.
Right arrow Articles by Collett, T. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The binding and recall of snapshot memories in wood ants (Formica rufa L.)

Paul Graham, Virginie Durier and Thomas S. Collett*

School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: t.s.collett{at}sussex.ac.uk)

Accepted 27 October 2003

Insects can locate spatial goals by means of 2-D retinotopic views of the surrounding landmarks, which they memorise from the vantage point of the goal. Wood ants acquire such snapshot memories while fixating conspicuous landmarks with frontal retina, and their snapshots extend horizontally at least 120° into the periphery. Are spatially separate items within such an extended snapshot bound together so that a snapshot is recalled as a whole, or are its components recognised individually?

We approached this question by training ants to find food midway between two upright black cylinders of different sizes and then examined where they searched when they were given two cylinders of the same size. If the ants know which cylinder replaces the small cylinder and which the large, they should search at a position where the two equal-sized cylinders subtend the same angles as do the training cylinders when viewed from the feeder. Ants conformed to this prediction under one condition, searching at a shorter distance from the substitute for the large cylinder than from the substitute for the small cylinder. But, under another condition, ants were unable to distinguish between the two equal-sized cylinders. Ants failed when white curtains completely surrounded the platform on which the cylinders were placed. They succeeded when one side of the platform had a patterned curtain.

We suggest that ants take two snapshots at the feeding site, one when facing the small cylinder and one when facing the large cylinder, and that each snapshot includes the patterned curtain, if it is there. Ants will view the patterned curtain with the lateral retina of one eye when facing the small cylinder and with the lateral retina of the other eye when facing the large cylinder. Our data suggest that there may be associative links between these spatially separate components of the snapshot, which cause the memory of the small cylinder or the large cylinder to be recalled according to which eye sees the curtain. It seems that an extended snapshot not only enhances the accuracy of localisation but can also increase the reliability of snapshot recall, provided that the components of a snapshot are bound together.

Key words: wood ant, landmark guidance, snapshot, binding, configural learning, navigation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

SNAP-HAPPY ANTS
Sarah Tilley
JEB 2004 207: 385-386. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
W. F. Towne and H. Moscrip
The connection between landscapes and the solar ephemeris in honeybees
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2008; 211(23): 3729 - 3736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Sommer, C. von Beeren, and R. Wehner
From the Cover: Multiroute memories in desert ants
PNAS, January 8, 2008; 105(1): 317 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. S. Collett, P. Graham, and R. A. Harris
Novel landmark-guided routes in ants
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2007; 210(12): 2025 - 2032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
V. Durier, P. Graham, and T. S. Collett
Switching destinations: memory change in wood ants
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2004; 207(14): 2401 - 2408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. Tilley
SNAP-HAPPY ANTS
J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 207(3): 385 - 386.
[Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004