QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online December 3, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 4679-4695 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01331

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lovvorn, J. R. Articles by Liggins, G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lovvorn, J. R. Articles by Liggins, G. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Stroke patterns and regulation of swim speed and energy cost in free-ranging Brünnich's guillemots

James R. Lovvorn^1,*, Yutaka Watanuki², Akiko Kato³, Yasuhiko Naito³ and Geoffrey A. Liggins^4,

¹ Department of Zoology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
² Graduate School of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Minato-cho 3-1-1, Hakodate 041-8611, Japan
³ National Institute of Polar Research, 9-10 Kaga 1-chome, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8515, Japan
⁴ Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: lovvorn{at}uwyo.edu)

Accepted 4 October 2004

Loggers were attached to free-ranging Brünnich's guillemots Uria lomvia during dives, to measure swim speeds, body angles, stroke rates, stroke and glide durations, and acceleration patterns within strokes, and the data were used to model the mechanical costs of propelling the body fuselage (head and trunk excluding wings). During vertical dives to 102–135 m, guillemots regulated their speed during descent and much of ascent to about 1.6±0.2 m s^–1. Stroke rate declined very gradually with depth, with little or no gliding between strokes. Entire strokes from 2 m to 20 m depth had similar forward thrust on upstroke vs downstroke, whereas at deeper depths and during horizontal swimming there was much greater thrust on the downstroke. Despite this distinct transition, these differences had small effect (<6%) on our estimates of mechanical cost to propel the body fuselage, which did not include drag of the wings. Work stroke^–1 was quite high as speed increased dramatically in the first 5 m of descent against high buoyancy. Thereafter, speed and associated drag increased gradually as buoyancy slowly declined, so that mechanical work stroke^–1 during the rest of descent stayed relatively constant. Similar work stroke^–1 was maintained during non-pursuit swimming at the bottom, and during powered ascent to the depth of neutral buoyancy (about 71 m). Even with adjustments in respiratory air volume of ±60%, modeled work against buoyancy was important mainly in the top 15 m of descent, after which almost all work was against drag. Drag was in fact underestimated, as our values did not include enhancement of drag by altered flow around active swimmers. With increasing buoyancy during ascent above 71 m, stroke rate, glide periods, stroke acceleration patterns, body angle and work stroke^–1 were far more variable than during descent; however, mean speed remained fairly constant until buoyancy increased rapidly near the surface. For dives to depths >20 m, drag is by far the main component of mechanical work for these diving birds, and speed may be regulated to keep work against drag within a relatively narrow range.

Key words: bird swimming, buoyancy, costs of diving, diving birds, drag, guillemots, stroke patterns, swim speed

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.R Lovvorn Thermal substitution and aerobic efficiency: measuring and predicting effects of heat balance on endotherm diving energetics Phil Trans R Soc B, November 29, 2007; 362(1487): 2079 - 2093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Gallon, C. E. Sparling, J.-Y. Georges, M. A. Fedak, M. Biuw, and D. Thompson How fast does a seal swim? Variations in swimming behaviour under differing foraging conditions J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3285 - 3294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Heath, H. G. Gilchrist, and R. C. Ydenberg Regulation of stroke pattern and swim speed across a range of current velocities: diving by common eiders wintering in polynyas in the Canadian Arctic J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2006; 209(20): 3974 - 3983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Watanabe, E. A. Baranov, K. Sato, Y. Naito, and N. Miyazaki Body density affects stroke patterns in Baikal seals J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2006; 209(17): 3269 - 3280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Watanuki, S. Wanless, M. Harris, J. R. Lovvorn, M. Miyazaki, H. Tanaka, and K. Sato Swim speeds and stroke patterns in wing-propelled divers: a comparison among alcids and a penguin J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2006; 209(7): 1217 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Enstipp, D. Gremillet, and D. R. Jones The effects of depth, temperature and food ingestion on the foraging energetics of a diving endotherm, the double-crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus) J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2006; 209(5): 845 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Enstipp, D. Gremillet, and S.-H. Lorentsen Energetic costs of diving and thermal status in European shags (Phalacrocorax aristotelis) J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): 3451 - 3461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]