QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online November 5, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 4299-4323 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01262

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thomas, A. L. R. Articles by Bomphrey, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thomas, A. L. R. Articles by Bomphrey, R. J.

Dragonfly flight: free-flight and tethered flow visualizations reveal a diverse array of unsteady lift-generating mechanisms, controlled primarily via angle of attack

Adrian L. R. Thomas^*, Graham K. Taylor, Robert B. Srygley, Robert L. Nudds and Richard J. Bomphrey

Department of Zoology, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: Adrian.thomas{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk)

Accepted 24 August 2004

Here we show, by qualitative free- and tethered-flight flow visualization, that dragonflies fly by using unsteady aerodynamic mechanisms to generate high-lift, leading-edge vortices. In normal free flight, dragonflies use counterstroking kinematics, with a leading-edge vortex (LEV) on the forewing downstroke, attached flow on the forewing upstroke, and attached flow on the hindwing throughout. Accelerating dragonflies switch to in-phase wing-beats with highly separated downstroke flows, with a single LEV attached across both the fore- and hindwings. We use smoke visualizations to distinguish between the three simplest local analytical solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations yielding flow separation resulting in a LEV. The LEV is an open U-shaped separation, continuous across the thorax, running parallel to the wing leading edge and inflecting at the tips to form wingtip vortices. Air spirals in to a free-slip critical point over the centreline as the LEV grows. Spanwise flow is not a dominant feature of the flow field – spanwise flows sometimes run from wingtip to centreline, or vice versa – depending on the degree of sideslip. LEV formation always coincides with rapid increases in angle of attack, and the smoke visualizations clearly show the formation of LEVs whenever a rapid increase in angle of attack occurs. There is no discrete starting vortex. Instead, a shear layer forms behind the trailing edge whenever the wing is at a non-zero angle of attack, and rolls up, under Kelvin–Helmholtz instability, into a series of transverse vortices with circulation of opposite sign to the circulation around the wing and LEV. The flow fields produced by dragonflies differ qualitatively from those published for mechanical models of dragonflies, fruitflies and hawkmoths, which preclude natural wing interactions. However, controlled parametric experiments show that, provided the Strouhal number is appropriate and the natural interaction between left and right wings can occur, even a simple plunging plate can reproduce the detailed features of the flow seen in dragonflies. In our models, and in dragonflies, it appears that stability of the LEV is achieved by a general mechanism whereby flapping kinematics are configured so that a LEV would be expected to form naturally over the wing and remain attached for the duration of the stroke. However, the actual formation and shedding of the LEV is controlled by wing angle of attack, which dragonflies can vary through both extremes, from zero up to a range that leads to immediate flow separation at any time during a wing stroke.

Key words: dragonfly, flight, leading edge vortex, micro-air vehicles, unsteady aerodynamics, critical point theory, spanwise flow

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Lu and G. X. Shen Three-dimensional flow structures and evolution of the leading-edge vortices on a flapping wing J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1221 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. T. Muijres, L. C. Johansson, R. Barfield, M. Wolf, G. R. Spedding, and A. Hedenstrom Leading-Edge Vortex Improves Lift in Slow-Flying Bats Science, February 29, 2008; 319(5867): 1250 - 1253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. K. Wang and M. Sun A computational study of the aerodynamics and forewing-hindwing interaction of a model dragonfly in forward flight J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2005; 208(19): 3785 - 3804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Bomphrey, N. J. Lawson, N. J. Harding, G. K. Taylor, and A. L. R. Thomas The aerodynamics of Manduca sexta: digital particle image velocimetry analysis of the leading-edge vortex J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2005; 208(6): 1079 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]