|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online November 5, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 4291-4298 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01281
Metabolic power of European starlings Sturnus vulgaris during flight in a wind tunnel, estimated from heat transfer modelling, doubly labelled water and mask respirometry
1 Aberdeen Centre for Energy Regulation and Obesity, School of Biological
Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, UK
2 Institüt der Zoologie, Universität des Saarlandes, D-66041
Saarbrücken, Germany
3 School of Biology, L. C. Miall Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2
9JT, UK
4 Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB21 9SB,
UK
* Author for correspondence at present address: School of Biology, Bute Medical Buildings, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TS, UK (e-mail: sw29{at}st-andrews.ac.uk)
Accepted 14 September 2004
It is technically demanding to measure the energetic cost of animal flight. Each of the previously available techniques has some disadvantage as well advantages. We compared measurements of the energetic cost of flight in a wind tunnel by four European starlings Sturnus vulgaris made using three independent techniques: heat transfer modelling, doubly labelled water (DLW) and mask respirometry. We based our heat transfer model on thermal images of the surface temperature of the birds and air flow past the body and wings calculated from wing beat kinematics. Metabolic power was not sensitive to uncertainty in the value of efficiency when estimated from heat transfer modelling. A change in the assumed value of whole animal efficiency from 0.19 to 0.07 (the range of estimates in previous studies) only altered metabolic power predicted from heat transfer modelling by 13%. The same change in the assumed value of efficiency would cause a 2.7-fold change in metabolic power if it were predicted from mechanical power. Metabolic power did not differ significantly between measurements made using the three techniques when we assumed an efficiency in the range 0.110.19, although the DLW results appeared to form a U-shaped power-speed curve while the heat transfer model and respirometry results increased linearly with speed. This is the first time that techniques for determining metabolic power have been compared using data from the same birds flying under the same conditions. Our data provide reassurance that all the techniques produce similar results and suggest that heat transfer modelling may be a useful method for estimating metabolic rate.
Key words: flight, heat transfer, thermal imaging, thermography, doubly labelled water, metabolic power, bird, efficiency, starling, Sturnus vulgaris
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Swartz, K. S. Breuer, and D. J. Willis Aeromechanics in aeroecology: flight biology in the aerosphere Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 85 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Asher and M. Bateson Use and husbandry of captive European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in scientific research: a review of current practice Lab Anim, April 1, 2008; 42(2): 111 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W. Tobalske Biomechanics of bird flight J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3135 - 3146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Bundle, K. S. Hansen, and K. P. Dial Does the metabolic rate-flight speed relationship vary among geometrically similar birds of different mass? J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2007; 210(6): 1075 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Bishop Circulatory variables and the flight performance of birds J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2005; 208(9): 1695 - 1708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||